2019
DOI: 10.32404/rean.v6i4.3624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agronomic Performance and Photosynthetically Active Radiation Intercepted by Maize Intercropped With Brachiaria

Abstract: Maize and soybean are the main crops used for crop yield on Brazilian Cerrado biome. The off-season maize intercropped with ruzigrass [Urochloa ruziziensis (R. Germ. & C.M. Evrard) Crins (Syn. Brachiaria ruziziensis Germ. & Evrard)] increases soil cover and yield for crops in succession. However, the benefits on maize yield depend on the distribution and radiation-use efficiency (RUE) and its conversion to biomass. This study aimed to evaluate maize and ruzigrass yield in different cultivation systems. The exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result demonstrates that the species intercropped with corn may not have competed for nutrients, water and light, which was also reported by [12] and [22]. Corroborating these results, [13] evaluated corn yield in different types of cultivation with Brachiaria ruziziensis and the average yield was 7905 kg ha -1 . According to the authors, corn grain yields were more influenced by the types of cultivation than by the presence of the forage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This result demonstrates that the species intercropped with corn may not have competed for nutrients, water and light, which was also reported by [12] and [22]. Corroborating these results, [13] evaluated corn yield in different types of cultivation with Brachiaria ruziziensis and the average yield was 7905 kg ha -1 . According to the authors, corn grain yields were more influenced by the types of cultivation than by the presence of the forage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%