2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-83582013000200019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seletividade de herbicidas residuais ao feijão-comum durante o período inicial da fase vegetativa

Abstract: Avaliou-se neste trabalho a seletividade de herbicidas residuais, aplicados em doses crescentes, na condição de pré-emergência, sobre o crescimento do feijão-comum (Phaseolus vulgaris) durante o início da fase vegetativa da cultura. O estudo foi conduzido em casa de vegetação, em delineamento inteiramente ao acaso e com tratamentos arranjados em esquema fatorial, utilizando-se cinco repetições. O cultivar de feijão utilizado para avaliar os efeitos dos tratamentos foi o IPR Graúna. O fator A foi composto de ci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among many tools available to study plants competition in a community, it is possible to highlight the studies that take into account the weed interference periods, compared to a crop of interest (Swanton et al 2015), and also the economic threshold level (ETL) (Galon et al 2007;Agostinetto et al 2010). In this way, this is another study with applicability, since it relates grain yield losses using the density, dry matter, soil cover and leaf area of weeds compared to control costs, allowing to evaluate the gain obtained according to the treatment (Kalsing and Vidal 2013). Studies on the interference and competitiveness of weed and crops allow developing more effective weed management strategies with less impact on the environment (Zhang et al 2016).…”
Section: Plant Protection -Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among many tools available to study plants competition in a community, it is possible to highlight the studies that take into account the weed interference periods, compared to a crop of interest (Swanton et al 2015), and also the economic threshold level (ETL) (Galon et al 2007;Agostinetto et al 2010). In this way, this is another study with applicability, since it relates grain yield losses using the density, dry matter, soil cover and leaf area of weeds compared to control costs, allowing to evaluate the gain obtained according to the treatment (Kalsing and Vidal 2013). Studies on the interference and competitiveness of weed and crops allow developing more effective weed management strategies with less impact on the environment (Zhang et al 2016).…”
Section: Plant Protection -Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kalsing and Vidal [20] , in a study conducted in a greenhouse (Dual Gold® 915 g L -1 , using dosages of 1200, 1800, 2400 and 3600 g/ha) it was again shown that the herbicide ha dno significative effect on the emergency of bean plants, regardless of the dosage tested. However, there was an effect reducing the root dry mass and shoot dry mass (the later only for the highest concentration tested).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For Kalsing and Vidal (2013), several specific factors, such as environmental conditions, soil attributes and crop management, among others, may affect crops tolerance to herbicides in higher or lower levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%