1999
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-73861999000400011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in modelling of mechatronic systems: the toolset FASIM_C++ for the simulation of vehicle dynamics

Abstract: The increasing complexity of controller systems, applied in modern passenger cars, requires adequate simulation tools. The toolset FASIM_C++, described in the following, uses complex vehicle models in three-dimensional vehicle dynamics simulation. The structure of the implemented dynamic models and the generation of the equations of motion applying the method of kinematic differentials is explained briefly. After a short introduction in methods of event handling, several vehicle models and applications like co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rill (2006) and Adamski et al (1999) describe in more details how some of these more complex multibody models work, showing the benefits of the flexibility that these models allow to the design engineer. By adopting these more complex models the engineer can get very accurate results for the vehicle dynamics response, including the steady-state metrics previously mentioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rill (2006) and Adamski et al (1999) describe in more details how some of these more complex multibody models work, showing the benefits of the flexibility that these models allow to the design engineer. By adopting these more complex models the engineer can get very accurate results for the vehicle dynamics response, including the steady-state metrics previously mentioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility for the design engineer is to consider a detailed multibody model, making use of commercial multibody software packages, as it has been done using ADAMS ® in works by Rongshan et al (2010), Wu et al (2009), Vilela (2001) and Prado et al (2001) -this is currently a widely disseminated approach. By adopting these more complex models the engineer can get very accurate results for the vehicle dynamics response - Rill (2006) and Adamski et al (1999) describe in more detail how some of these multibody models work, showing the benefits of the flexibility they bring to the design engineer. The issue with this approach is that, as the multibody model gets details in the vehicle construction representation (a common multibody model easily contains more than 100 degrees of freedom), it also becomes less efficient in computational running time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%