Novamente a questão do aborto no Brasil: ventos de mudança?

Temporal trends and spatial distribution of unsafe abortion in Brazil, 1996-2012

“…i However, there was little change in the diversity in options for contraception used by women with lower socioeconomic status. 21 In 2006, the main methods used by the population with greater social and economic vulnerability were female sterilization and oral contraception. i The results of this study suggest that there are still important gaps in the provision of reproductive health services and that greater efforts to improve access and adherence to the use of contraceptives are needed.…”

“… 17 Regardless of the legal question that encompasses the abortion, the importance of ensuring access and qualified care to maternal health is emphasized. 12 , 21 Strategies for prevention of unsafe abortions and consequently, resulting deaths, involve integrated actions at all levels of prevention in the health services network, such as: reduction of unwanted pregnancies, quality health care during the abortion procedure, recognition and appropriate management of complications and pre-and post-abortion family planning. 12 …”

“…The practice of abortion is considered a crime in the country, being permitted by law in cases of sexual violence (rape) or maternal risk of life 8 , c and, more recently, in cases of pregnancies of anencephalic fetuses. 21 Against the difficulties of registering the number of abortions, the estimates are based on hospital admissions due to abortion recorded in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). 17 , 18 It is estimated that between 729,000 and 1.25 million unsafe abortions are performed annually.…”

Conhecimento de médicos residentes em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia sobre o aborto medicamentoso

“…In Brazil, based on the National Survey on Abortion in 2016 (PNA 2016), nearly one out of five Brazilian women had undergone an abortion by age 40 2 . In countries like Brazil with legal restrictions, clandestine abortion is practiced by women of all social and economic levels, but the consequences are most severe for those living in situations of social vulnerability (low schooling, low income, young age, and single marital status), given the precarious health conditions in which such abortions are performed 2,3 . The World Health Organization (WHO) classified this type as unsafe abortion 4 .…”

Locus de controle e a escolha de métodos contraceptivos entre jovens universitárias de uma escola de enfermagem do sul de Minas Gerais

“…No entanto, a própria personalidade da jovem universitária é um fator determinante para a escolha do método, já que o comportamento das mesmas, em relação às suas necessidades anticoncepcionais, é influenciado pelo contexto interpessoal, cultural e de personalidade. Portanto, devem-se levar em conta, quais são as suas características, opiniões, perspectivas e necessidades, sendo considerados autoritários os serviços e profissionais que tomam decisões pelas usuárias, considerando-as objetos ou não sujeitos dos programas [5][6][7].…”