1998
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-69911998000400007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A colangiografia peroperatória

Abstract: Os autores revisam 96 procedimentos colangiográficos peroperatórios realizados no Departamento de Cirurgia da Faculdade de Medicina de Marília (FAMEMA) entre janeiro de 1993 e fevereiro de 1995. Dos exames estudados, setenta foram considerados normais, 23 alterados e três inconclusivos. Os autores apresentam casos onde a colangiografia peroperatória (CPO) não confirmou a suspeita pré-operatória, o que evitou explorações desnecessárias da via biliar (6,25%) ou não permitiu diagnóstico incorreto (9,36%). Do expo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the presented series, with two X-rays has found to recognize most of the changes. It is possible: 1) to evaluate the anatomy of the entire biliary tree; 2) to identify unsuspected gallstones in the biliary tract; 3) to recognize intraluminal content in large and small overpressure after emptying; 4) to do immediate identification of any injuries; 5) to recognize patency, shape, capacity and diseases of the duodenal papilla; 6) to document the biliary tract 1,2,11 . The advantages are: 1) allows repetition, like all other forms of intraoperative radiographic study; 2) saves a radiograph; 3) decreases the time of anesthesia and radiological work-up; 4) allows radiomanometric study; 5) decreases exposure to X-ray; 6) less access and less handling time by the technician, with less risk of infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the presented series, with two X-rays has found to recognize most of the changes. It is possible: 1) to evaluate the anatomy of the entire biliary tree; 2) to identify unsuspected gallstones in the biliary tract; 3) to recognize intraluminal content in large and small overpressure after emptying; 4) to do immediate identification of any injuries; 5) to recognize patency, shape, capacity and diseases of the duodenal papilla; 6) to document the biliary tract 1,2,11 . The advantages are: 1) allows repetition, like all other forms of intraoperative radiographic study; 2) saves a radiograph; 3) decreases the time of anesthesia and radiological work-up; 4) allows radiomanometric study; 5) decreases exposure to X-ray; 6) less access and less handling time by the technician, with less risk of infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On July 15, 1867, John S.Bobs, believing that the removal of the gallstone would be the treatment for biliary disease, performed the first successful cholecystostomy. With the idea that the withdrawal of the gallstones with the maintenance of the gallbladder would not be the definitive treatment, Carl Langenbuch made the first successful cholecystectomy on July 5, 1882 1 . On June 18, 1931, Pablo Luis Mirizzi made the first intraoperative cholangiography (CT) and drew attention to it in articles published in several languages, motivating its use in routine management of biliary tree 3,7,8,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He stated that cholangiography should be a part of the cholecystectomy procedure. That is to say, he proposed routine perioperative cholangiography and started a controversy that still exists nowadays (1,13) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%