2014
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-69162014000400016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shewhart's control charts and process capability ratio applied to a sewage treatment station

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The current study used statistical methods of quality control to evaluate the performance of a sewage treatment station. The concerned station is located in Cascavel city, Paraná State. The evaluated parameters were hydrogenionic potential, settleable solids, total suspended solids, chemical oxygen demand and biochemical oxygen demand in five days. Statistical analysis was performed through Shewhart control charts and process capability ratio. According to Shewhart charts, only the BOD (5.20) variable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some applications of statistical control in non-industrial processes and in environment monitoring were reviewed by Cobert and Pan (2002). Shewhart's control charts (Shewhart 1939) of selected individual variables were used for the evaluation of sewage treatment stations (Berthoex et al 1978;Orssatto et al 2014) and river water quality (Iglesias et al 2016). The use of a cumulative sum (CUSUM) method for monitoring of water quality in storages was described by Mac Nally and Hart (1997) and also discussed, for example, by Cobert and Pan (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some applications of statistical control in non-industrial processes and in environment monitoring were reviewed by Cobert and Pan (2002). Shewhart's control charts (Shewhart 1939) of selected individual variables were used for the evaluation of sewage treatment stations (Berthoex et al 1978;Orssatto et al 2014) and river water quality (Iglesias et al 2016). The use of a cumulative sum (CUSUM) method for monitoring of water quality in storages was described by Mac Nally and Hart (1997) and also discussed, for example, by Cobert and Pan (2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 presents the concentration of the various performance monitoring parameters that were discharged from the PWW treatment plant under study. The values of the organic parameters like BOD 5 , COD and TSS showed a higher variability, i.e., 44.93%, 50.71%, and 20.33%, respectively, as their coefficient variation percentage was >20% (Orssatto et al, 2014). The O&G parameter showed a higher variability, with a 68.65% coefficient of variation, while the nutrient content in NH 3 -N showed variability of 29.49%.…”
Section: Evaluating the Performance Monitoring Parametersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The deployments of increasing frequent environmental laws and stringent rules on the classification of water bodies and environmental guidelines were made to frame CONAMA RESOLUTION nº 357, on 17 March 2005. Technological development for systems that make use of low-quality water is increasingly necessary, considering the rationing of this well increasingly scarce on the planet (Orssatto et al, 2014). Faced with the problem of scarcity of water resources, saline water irrigation system applied to crops was used as an alternative; aimed to save water resources of good quality (Busato and Soares, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%