2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-69162013000600017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geostatistics and remote sensing methods in the classification of images of areas cultivated with citrus

Abstract: This study compares the precision of three image classification methods, two of remote sensing and one of geostatistics applied to areas cultivated with citrus. The 5,296.52ha area of study is located in the city of Araraquara - central region of the state of São Paulo (SP), Brazil. The multispectral image from the CCD/CBERS-2B satellite was acquired in 2009 and processed through the Geographic Information System (GIS) SPRING. Three classification methods were used, one unsupervised (Cluster), and two supervis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Maxver classifier uses the Maximum Likelihood (ML) algorithm which assumes that the digital numbers of a class in the image bands are normally distributed and calculates the probability of each pixel belonging to that class [42]. ML takes into account the mean and covariance vectors of the training sets of a class in a 3dimensional space and assigns each pixel to the class for which it has the highest probability of membership [43]. Since the Maxver classifier is a supervised classification technique, all pixels were assigned to the four land cover classes.…”
Section: Description Of the Selected Image Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Maxver classifier uses the Maximum Likelihood (ML) algorithm which assumes that the digital numbers of a class in the image bands are normally distributed and calculates the probability of each pixel belonging to that class [42]. ML takes into account the mean and covariance vectors of the training sets of a class in a 3dimensional space and assigns each pixel to the class for which it has the highest probability of membership [43]. Since the Maxver classifier is a supervised classification technique, all pixels were assigned to the four land cover classes.…”
Section: Description Of the Selected Image Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os parâmetros do variograma são intervalo da distância em que o variograma atinge o limiar, ou seja, é a distância que a variável apresenta dependência espacial, efeito pepita reflete a erro analítico, indicando uma variabilidade inexplicada de um ponto a outro, o que pode ser devido tanto a erros nas medições ou micro variações não detectadas devido à distância de amostragem, componente estrutural quanto a variação depende da distância, limiar valor em que o variograma é estabilizada e é, aproximadamente, igual à da variância dos dados (SILVA et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…The Kappa index (Cohen, 1960) evaluates how much the results in classification differ from a random classification, as well as informing the level of agreement in classification; the first two models achieved an index considered reasonable (Kappa < 0.4), similar to the results obtained by Silva et al, (2013) in a classifier of areas cultivated in citrus fruit; for the other models, the index was considered moderate to good (0.4< Kappa <0.6). The performance of the Kappa index and the overall accuracy was not exceptional, but when considered globally in relation to others, such as Foody (2002), Shind et al, (2014) and Lottes et al, (2016), these results do indicate a great potential for improvement over the traditional approach to weed management in Brazil.…”
Section: Performance Of Each Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%