2016
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2016000700006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic parameters and agronomic evaluation of cassava genotypes

Abstract: -The objective of this work was to estimate genetic parameters and predict genetic values for the selection of cassava (Manihot esculenta) genotypes in the state of Pará, Brazil. The trial was performed with 56 genotypes in two growing seasons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The heritability estimates recorded in our study also indicate a good repeatability and reproducibility of the experimental procedures. The heritability estimates we found are comparable to those previously reported in other studies for these traits (Oliveira et al 2014 , 2015 ; Njoku et al 2015 ; Silva et al 2016 ; Favour et al 2017 ; Rao et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The heritability estimates recorded in our study also indicate a good repeatability and reproducibility of the experimental procedures. The heritability estimates we found are comparable to those previously reported in other studies for these traits (Oliveira et al 2014 , 2015 ; Njoku et al 2015 ; Silva et al 2016 ; Favour et al 2017 ; Rao et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…(2019), Silva et al. (2016), and Avijala et al. (2015) found moderate but significant correlations between these yield traits ranging from r = .33 to r = .43, suggesting that root number per plant and harvest index could be used as a complementary trait for root weight to select for fresh root yield.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…According to Resende (2002), selective accuracy can range from 0 to 1, classified as very high (SA prog ≥ 0.90), high (0.70 ≤ SA prog ≤ 0.90), moderate (0.50 ≤ SA prog ≤ 0.70), and low (SA prog < 0.50). Root weight and CMD foliar symptoms at 6 and 9 MAP had very high selection accuracy (≥0.92), indicating high precision and selectiveness (Silva et al., 2016). Cassava mosaic disease foliar symptoms at 3 MAP, CBSD foliar symptoms at 6 MAP, root necrosis, root necrosis incidence, root number per plant, and harvest index had high selection accuracy (0.70–0.89), indicating high precision and medium selectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations