2015
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2015001200009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Componentes da biomassa e características estruturais em capim-aruana sob diferentes frequências e intensidades de desfolhação

Abstract: Resumo -O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o efeito de frequências e intensidades de desfolhação sobre os componentes da biomassa e a estrutura do dossel em capim-aruana (Panicum maximum 'Aruana IZ-5'), pastejado sob lotação rotativa com ovinos. Avaliaram-se duas frequências de desfolhação (FD), com níveis de interceptação de 85 e 95% da radiação fotossinteticamente ativa (Irfa) incidente no topo do dossel, e duas intensidades de desfolhação (ID), com índices de área foliar residual (IAFr) de 1,0 e 1,8. Uti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(17 reference statements)
2
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the defoliations were performed to the same post-cutting residual height of 10 cm, the plants took longer to reach greater heights, which led to longer cutting intervals. This behavior has also been described in the Marandu (DIFANTE et al, 2011), Mulato (SILVEIRA et al, 2013, Tanzania (EUCLIDES et al, 2014), Mombaça (EUCLIDES et al, 2015), and Aruana (SILVA et al, 2015a) grasses. These results reinforce the impossibility of using fixed and pre-determined rest days for the management of pastures, including digit grass.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Because the defoliations were performed to the same post-cutting residual height of 10 cm, the plants took longer to reach greater heights, which led to longer cutting intervals. This behavior has also been described in the Marandu (DIFANTE et al, 2011), Mulato (SILVEIRA et al, 2013, Tanzania (EUCLIDES et al, 2014), Mombaça (EUCLIDES et al, 2015), and Aruana (SILVA et al, 2015a) grasses. These results reinforce the impossibility of using fixed and pre-determined rest days for the management of pastures, including digit grass.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Variations in RDM and PD of the root density of Florico grass, managed using four different pasture strategies, were consistent with the management strategy applied to the shoots because of the close relationship between the aerial and the underground components of pasture growth, where the root is the source of energy and the shoot is a drain on the organic reserves (Rodrigues et al, 2007;Silva et al, 2015). To establish a relationship between the effects occurring in the aerial part of the plant and the root system, variables such as pre-grazing pasture height, accumulation of forage mass, and the LAI were analyzed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In this context, it is difficult to design pasture management strategies that increase the intensity and/ or frequency of grazing without reducing the root dry matter mass reserve (Rodrigues et al, 2007;Sarmento et al, 2008;Kaiser et al, 2009). The effective depth of the root system of Florico grass under grazing was found to be 35 cm by Cunha et al (2010), whereas Camargo Filho (2007) showed that 85% of the roots were found at a depth of 40 cm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After counting, the material contained inside estimate the forage biomass production; the samples were cut at the height established for the intensities of 15 and 30 cm (adapted from HERLING et al, 1998), the material was packed in properly identified plastic bags and sent to the laboratory and the plots were uniformed to start a new evaluation cycle. The material was separated into leaf, stem (true stem + sheath) and dead material (SILVA et al, 2015), the fractions were placed in identified paper bags and then weighed and dried in a forced circulation air oven at 55°C to constant weight and then weighed again. Thus, leaf dry biomass (LDB), stem dry biomass (SDB), dead forage biomass (DFB) and total dry forage biomass (TDFB) were estimated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The leaf/stem ratio (L/S) was determined by dividing LDB by SDB (PINTO et al, 1994). Samples, which were pre-dried in an oven, were ground in 1-milliliter Willey sieves for analysis of DM content (%natural matter) and, based on DM, crude protein (CP), mineral matter (MM), according to AOAC procedures (2010); neutral detergent fiber (NDF), according to the methodology of Van Soest et al (1991) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) and acid detergent lignin (ADL), according to the methodology of Van Soest et al (1963). The collected data were tabulated and grouped according to the cycles during the rainy season.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%