2015
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2015000700006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procedures for evaluating the tolerance of cassava genotypes to postharvest physiological deterioration

Abstract: -The objective of this work was to define procedures to assess the tolerance of cassava genotypes to postharvest physiological deterioration (PPD) and to microbial deterioration (MD). Roots of six cassava genotypes were evaluated in two experiments, during storage under different environmental conditions: high temperature and low soil moisture; or low temperature and high soil moisture. Roots were treated or not with fungicide (carbendazim) before storage. Genotype reactions to MD and PPD were evaluated at 0, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickness of the cut slices was about 1 cm at 25, 50, and 75% of the total root length, referred to as proximal, medial, and distal, respectively. Next, the severity of PPD was evaluated according to two diagrammatic scales, one proposed by Wheatley and Schwabe (1985) for peripheral symptoms, and the second proposed by Venturini et al (2015) for symptoms distributed throughout the root, both with variation in scores from 0 to 100%. The PPD values for each root were calculated by averaging the scores of the three transverse slices.…”
Section: Ppd Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the cut slices was about 1 cm at 25, 50, and 75% of the total root length, referred to as proximal, medial, and distal, respectively. Next, the severity of PPD was evaluated according to two diagrammatic scales, one proposed by Wheatley and Schwabe (1985) for peripheral symptoms, and the second proposed by Venturini et al (2015) for symptoms distributed throughout the root, both with variation in scores from 0 to 100%. The PPD values for each root were calculated by averaging the scores of the three transverse slices.…”
Section: Ppd Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the analysis results for PPD responses using the available methods are also contained a high experimental error (Morante et al 2010;Gracia et al 2013;Mahmod and Beching 2018). According to Morante et al (2010), Tumuhimbise et al (2015), and Verturini et al (2015), the PPD response trait is controlled genetically. However, environmental factors also played an essential role in PPD response, especially to the onset of the PPD responses (Zainuddin et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Injuring of the cassava root crop during harvest triggers the contact of linamarin and linamarase enzyme which leads to an eventual production of hydrogen cyanide [36]. This process requires the presence of oxygen [37]. The coating process prevents oxygen access to the root hence it may have prevented the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that accelerate production of cyanide [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%