2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2006000600006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of peanut genotypes for resistance to Tomato spotted wilt virus by mechanical and thrips inoculation

Abstract: -The objective of this work was to evaluate the reactions of three peanut breeding lines and ICGV 86388) to Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) by mechanical and thrips inoculation, under greenhouse conditions, and compare them to the reactions of cultivars SunOleic, Georgia Green, and the breeding line C11-2-39. TSWV infection by mechanical inoculation was visually assessed using an index ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (apical death). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to confirm TSWV infection fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, they can tolerate a delayed chemical spray interval and may contribute to significant reduction in chemical inputs. Such a slower disease progress was earlier observed in peanut against GBNV (Kesmala, and Kesmala et al., ) and TSWV (Nascimento et al., ), in cucumber against cucumber mosaic virus (Munshi et al., ) and in okra against okra yellow vein mosaic virus (Seth, Chattopadhyay, Dutta, Hazra, & Singh, ). Further, in the experiment it was also observed that the P1, F 1 , F 2 and BC1 showed a higher plant survival and vine length compared to P2, BC2 and checks for both the crosses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, they can tolerate a delayed chemical spray interval and may contribute to significant reduction in chemical inputs. Such a slower disease progress was earlier observed in peanut against GBNV (Kesmala, and Kesmala et al., ) and TSWV (Nascimento et al., ), in cucumber against cucumber mosaic virus (Munshi et al., ) and in okra against okra yellow vein mosaic virus (Seth, Chattopadhyay, Dutta, Hazra, & Singh, ). Further, in the experiment it was also observed that the P1, F 1 , F 2 and BC1 showed a higher plant survival and vine length compared to P2, BC2 and checks for both the crosses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…TSWV (Nascimento et al, 2006), in cucumber against cucumber mosaic virus (Munshi et al, 2008) and in okra against okra yellow vein mosaic virus (Seth, Chattopadhyay, Dutta, Hazra, & Singh, 2017). Further, in the experiment it was also observed that the P1, F 1 , F 2 and BC1 showed a higher plant survival and vine length compared to P2, BC2 and checks for both the crosses.…”
Section: Wbnv Resistancementioning
confidence: 62%
“…The following parameters were evaluated at each sampling unit: number of plants per meter (stand), number of plants with symptoms of the disease, and a scoring scale of visual symptoms of the disease. The scale used to evaluate the severity of symptoms of TSWV was proposed by Lyerly et al (2002) and Nascimento et al (2006) and adapted for GRSV, where 1 was assigned for plants without symptoms, 2 for leaves with symptoms of yellowing, mosaic, and/or chlorotic spots, 3 for plants with symptoms of yellowing, mosaic and/or chlorotic spots, and height reduction), and 4 for chlorotic plants and stunting ( Figure 1). From the stand and percentage of plants with virus, sampling units were classified as 1) stand with failures and with a high virus incidence (WF+WV); 2) with failures and no virus (WF+NV); 3) no failures and with virus (NF+WV) and; 4) no failures and no virus (NF+NV), being the percentage of plants with virus and stand analyzed again.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thrips feeding and survival were suppressed on some resistant genotypes compared with susceptible genotypes. In Brazil, three peanut breeding lines (IC-1, IC-34, and ICGV 86388) showed resistance to TSWV under glass house and field tests (Nascimento et al, 2006).…”
Section: Spotted Wiltmentioning
confidence: 99%