2001
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2001000100020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parámetros físicos del suelo en condiciones no perturbadas y bajo laboreo

Abstract: Se estudió el efecto de dos sistemas de labranza sobre algunas propiedades del suelo y el rendimiento de soja. La experiencia se realizó sobre un Argiudol típico durante 1996. Los tratamientos fueron: siembra directa (SD), labranza vertical (LV) y un control no laboreado (T). Sedeterminó: densidad del suelo (DS); densidad máxima (DSMAX); compactación relativa (CR); porosidad estructural (PE); carbono orgánico total (COT), humificado (COH) y libre (COL) y humedad gravimétrica (HG). Se realizó el perfil cultural… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
2
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…CT promoted higher yields likely because of higher incorporation of vegetal residues into the soil, mineralization, and nutrient availability for plants. Lower yield values under NT conditions occurred because of the lower numbers of grains per pod, and pods per plant associated with a higher soil compaction along the four years during which this NT was established, a similar explanation was suggested by Ferreras et al (2001). Yield values were lesser than those find by Lopes et al (2007) who studied the effect of various covers on soybean crops, furthermore, they identified significant differences in the yields from NT and CT conditions, being higher those under CT, probably due to the effect of fertilizers.…”
Section: Cover Cropssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…CT promoted higher yields likely because of higher incorporation of vegetal residues into the soil, mineralization, and nutrient availability for plants. Lower yield values under NT conditions occurred because of the lower numbers of grains per pod, and pods per plant associated with a higher soil compaction along the four years during which this NT was established, a similar explanation was suggested by Ferreras et al (2001). Yield values were lesser than those find by Lopes et al (2007) who studied the effect of various covers on soybean crops, furthermore, they identified significant differences in the yields from NT and CT conditions, being higher those under CT, probably due to the effect of fertilizers.…”
Section: Cover Cropssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…FERRERAS et al (2001) observaram, em um solo siltoso sob PD uma DR de 0,82 e 0,85 nas camadas de 0-6cm e 10-16cm, respectivamente, e no PD escarificado na ordem de 0,69 e 0,85, nas mesmas camadas, refletindo drasticamente no rendimento da cultura da soja com a pequena diferença encontrada na camada de 10-16cm.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Em função disso, a descompactação facilita o desenvolvimento radicular das plantas, eleva a taxa de infiltração e a capacidade de armazenamento de água, aumenta a permeabilidade do solo (KOCHHANN & DENARDIN, 2000) e reduz a resistência mecânica do solo à penetração das raízes (INOUE et al, 2002 O rendimento de soja sob PD foi 47,88% inferior ao PDE provavelmente devido à compactação no sistema PD, reduzindo o desenvolvimento radicular em função do aumento da resistência mecânica que afeta a absorção de água e nutrientes (FERRERAS et al,2001), enquanto CAMARGO & ALLEONI (1997) destacam que, em solos compactados, a baixa aeração induz a ramificação das raízes adventícias superficiais, tornando-as menos eficientes na absorção de água e nutrientes.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…En general, se considera que la disponibilidad de N es más rápida bajo labranza convencional que en siembra directa, aunque la cantidad de N mineralizado puede ser suficiente para el desarrollo del cultivo en ambos sistemas (Doran, 1980). La labranza con cinceles puede mostrar un comportamiento intermedio entre reja y siembra directa, respecto de la dinámica de dicho nutriente (Alvarez et al, 1998), atenuando el problema de la insuficiente disponibilidad de N y la menor respuesta a la fertilización encontrada en siembra directa, frecuentemente, asociada a una mayor compactación (Balbuena et al, 1996;Ferreras et al, 2001) o al menos a un endurecimiento superficial del suelo (Taboada et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified