2000
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x2000001100009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of soybean yield through different sowing periods

Abstract: -Soybean yield is highly affected by sowing period and there are significant productivity losses when sowings are done outward a relatively restricted period in many regions of Brazil. Breeding cultivars less sensitive to photoperiod and to temperature variations is desirable for adaptation to wider sowing period and wider latitude range and also make irrigated soybean cultivation possible during the fall-winter seasons in frost free regions. The possibility of selecting high yielding and stable lines for yiel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the growth duration of the soybeans at two different latitudes, Suwon and Yeoncheon, the accumulated temperature and sunshine duration in 2015 increased relative to those in the normal years whereas the precipitation in 2015 severely declined rather than that of normal years. However, our results were similar to previous results that the soybeans grown at low latitude are earlier in flowering and maturing periods and are lower in biomass and yield than that at high latitude (Lima et al 2000), that drought-stress affect to decrease in seed yield and yield components (Frederick et al 2001), and that the increase of sunshine duration results in the increase of soybean yield (Kumar et al 2008). For these results, although we assumed that weather conditions are likely to affect the agronomic characteristics and chemical compositions but could not indicate a critical major environmental factor on regional variation of yield and growth because numerous weather conditions, especially precipitation and sunshine duration, were complicatedly different depending on cultivation years and regions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…During the growth duration of the soybeans at two different latitudes, Suwon and Yeoncheon, the accumulated temperature and sunshine duration in 2015 increased relative to those in the normal years whereas the precipitation in 2015 severely declined rather than that of normal years. However, our results were similar to previous results that the soybeans grown at low latitude are earlier in flowering and maturing periods and are lower in biomass and yield than that at high latitude (Lima et al 2000), that drought-stress affect to decrease in seed yield and yield components (Frederick et al 2001), and that the increase of sunshine duration results in the increase of soybean yield (Kumar et al 2008). For these results, although we assumed that weather conditions are likely to affect the agronomic characteristics and chemical compositions but could not indicate a critical major environmental factor on regional variation of yield and growth because numerous weather conditions, especially precipitation and sunshine duration, were complicatedly different depending on cultivation years and regions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Dependent on the photoperiod sensitivity of the cultivars, they matured later or even failed in reaching full maturity at the northern locations with their longer day lengths. Similar results were reported by Lima et al (2000), where cultivars when grown at a lower latitude flowered and matured earlier. Nevertheless, there are some locations where the genotypes responded differently than expected from the locations' latitude.…”
Section: Maturity Group Classification In Europesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar results were reported by Lima et al . (), where cultivars when grown at a lower latitude flowered and matured earlier. Nevertheless, there are some locations where the genotypes responded differently than expected from the locations' latitude.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous authors use different yieldstability statistics to evaluate performance of tested genotypes (YAN and RAJCAN, 2003), e.g. GGE biplot (ZHANG et al, 2005;MATEI et al, 2018), Wricke's ecovalence (SILVA et al, 2016), regression (b), determination (R 2 ) and deviation of the linear regression (σ 2 ) coefficients (LIMA et al, 2000), regression coefficient (b) (YAN et al, 2010), coefficients of variation (CV) (POPOVIĆ et al, 2012), amongst others. Interestingly, however, all stability indices are relative to each study and determine the best genotype among tested cultivars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%