1999
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-204x1999001100001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CONTROLE INTEGRADO DE SPODOPTERA FRUGIPERDA (SMITH & ABBOTT) UTILIZANDO-SE O PARASITÓIDE TELENOMUS REMUS NIXON

Abstract: 04). De maneira semelhante, houve diferença significativa no rendimento de espiga entre testemunha (7.165 kg/ha) e demais tratamentos (9.084 kg/ha). Não houve efeito dos tratamentos no comprimento da espiga e no dano às espigas.Termos para indexação: Zea mays, controle biológico, manejo integrado de pragas, Baculovírus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
18
1
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, T. remus is described in the literature as an excellent egg parasitoid for the Spodoptera complex and perfectly feasible in integrated management programs for S. frugiperda (Figueiredo et al 1999). It is important to consider that not only S. cosmioides, but also other species of the Spodoptera complex have increased their importance on crops such as soybean, corn and cotton.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, T. remus is described in the literature as an excellent egg parasitoid for the Spodoptera complex and perfectly feasible in integrated management programs for S. frugiperda (Figueiredo et al 1999). It is important to consider that not only S. cosmioides, but also other species of the Spodoptera complex have increased their importance on crops such as soybean, corn and cotton.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resultados semelhantes foram observados por Figueiredo et al (1999), ao comparar o efeito de liberações de Telenomus remus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), sozinho ou associado ao Baculovirus spodoptera ou ao inseticida lambdacialotrina para controle de S. frugiperda, os autores verificaram que, nas parcelas testemunhas, onde a praga e os inimigos naturais atuaram livremente, a nota média de dano foi 1,11, e que nos demais tratamentos, as notas médias de dano ficaram abaixo de 1,0. Resultados comparativos sobre o dano causado por S. frugiperda na cultura do milho, na ausência de seus inimigos naturais, usando o método descrito, ainda não foram relatados.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…A large amount of money is annually spent in attempts to control this pest (Cruz, 1995). Among the control strategies, insecticide is the most used to control S. frugiperda outbreaks (Figueiredo et al, 1999;Morales, 2001). Among the negative effects of the use of some insecticides is the development of insecticide resistance and environmental contamination (Diez-Rodriguez and Omoto, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good alternative to circumvent these problems is the biological control implementation. This control method is an excellent alternative to avoid an abusive use of chemical control (Ferrer, 2001;Figueiredo et al 1999). Several works have shown the high number of parasitoid species from different corn regions and also stressed the importance of these biological enemies to keep S. frugiperda outbreaks below the economic threshold (Schwartz and Gerling, 1974;Ferrer, 2001;Figueiredo et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%