2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-19652008000300005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontologias e vocabulários controlados: comparação de metodologias para construção

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a tool would facilitate the work of the researcher who would not need to analyze each evolution in detail, thereby reducing the time of this step and especially ensuring that no term was ignored during term extraction. However, it is important to understand that the use of software does not replace the researcher's work, since Pseudo-terminological expressions that are considered junk terminology would also need to be located, and one cannot ignore the context in which the terms appear in order to assign words which are related to the particular nursing language (16) . When comparing the results obtained in this study with those of other studies using the same method and the ICNP ® as a reference terminology (17)(18) , there is the fact of having used a large number of records, which allowed for the number of terms extracted to be quite high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a tool would facilitate the work of the researcher who would not need to analyze each evolution in detail, thereby reducing the time of this step and especially ensuring that no term was ignored during term extraction. However, it is important to understand that the use of software does not replace the researcher's work, since Pseudo-terminological expressions that are considered junk terminology would also need to be located, and one cannot ignore the context in which the terms appear in order to assign words which are related to the particular nursing language (16) . When comparing the results obtained in this study with those of other studies using the same method and the ICNP ® as a reference terminology (17)(18) , there is the fact of having used a large number of records, which allowed for the number of terms extracted to be quite high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nessa perspectiva, pesquisas estão sendo desenvolvidas no campo da Ciência da Informação focando em estudos sobre a problemática do excesso de informações e sua organização, com o objetivo de melhorar a eficácia dos sistemas de recuperação de informação. Podem-se citar, dentre outras, algumas pesquisas nessa perspectiva voltadas à exploração semântica da informação, tais como: a) Web Semântica e sua proposta emergente de dados interligados ou, também, dados abertos interligados -Linked Open Data -LOD, que intencionam criar metodologias, tecnologias e padrões de metadados para aumentar o escopo da interoperabilidade (BERNERS-LEE;HENDLER;LASSILA, 2001;BERNERS-LEE, 2006;BIZER;HEATH;BERNERS-LEE, 2009); b) instrumentos voltados à representação de relacionamentos semânticos e conceituais como ontologias (GRUBER, 1993;GUARINO, 1998;SMITH, 2004;ALMEIDA, 2013;SOERGEL, 2017) e vocabulários controlados (ANSI 2005;SOUZA;ALMEIDA, 2008;ABBAS, 2010) objetivando endereçar problemas relacionados à interoperabilidade de sistemas e bases de dados, além das dificuldades intrínsecas à manipulação da linguagem natural como, por exemplo, as questões de polissemia e sinonímia; e c) modelos conceituais, de referência e ontológicos que orientam a modelagem da realidade documental e o processo de busca e recuperação da informação em contextos digitais como o Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records -FRBR (IFLA, 1998) LEMOS; SOUZA, 2018) cujos esforços objetivaram transformar padrões de metadados multimídia como o MPEG-7 em formatos semelhantes a ontologias.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified