2014
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-06832014000300018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formas de fósforo no solo sob pastagens naturais submetidas à adição de fosfatos

Abstract: A maioria das pastagens naturais no bioma Campos no sul do Brasil cresce em solos com baixa disponibilidade de fósforo (P), mas com altos teores de P total e de P orgânico. Este trabalho objetivou avaliar as alterações nas formas de P no solo, ao longo de um ciclo de crescimento de pastagens naturais, decorrentes da aplicação de fontes de fosfato. Em três experimentos instalados em áreas de pastagem natural, foi aplicado P nas formas de hiperfosfato de Gafsa, superfosfato triplo e testemunha, arranjados em blo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Sufficient P concentrations in the soil indicated that grasses grown without P limitation resulted in higher shoot DM and relative growth rate (RGR). This result was in agreement with Gatiboni et al (2000) and Oliveira et al (2014), who reported that P is the nutrient that limits the forage yield in natural grasslands of South America.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Sufficient P concentrations in the soil indicated that grasses grown without P limitation resulted in higher shoot DM and relative growth rate (RGR). This result was in agreement with Gatiboni et al (2000) and Oliveira et al (2014), who reported that P is the nutrient that limits the forage yield in natural grasslands of South America.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This means that P solubility from BRP and ARP is very low in the short to medium term, especially in soils with higher Ca levels and high pH, as observed in the initial soil characterization of the present study. As soil samples were collected after the second year of sugarcane cultivation/fertilizer application, it implies that BRP and ARP were not effective in keeping the adequate levels of soil available P. Similar results were reported by Oliveira et al (41) in a study evaluating soil P fractions under pasture subjected to phosphate amendment.…”
Section: Soil P Fractionssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…As there were no differences in Pi NaOH 0.1 mol L −1 fraction between ARP, BRP, and the control, there was low dissolution of these rock phosphates throughout the two crop cultivation seasons, even under acidic soil conditions and under low P and Ca original levels. Oliveira et al (41), evaluating soil P fractions under natural pasture under phosphate sources, also reported low reactivity of Gafsa rock phosphate. Moreover, the amount of P in moderately labile fraction was higher under TSP, reaching mean values of 51.8 mg kg −1 of Pi + Po than 44.7 mg kg −1 of the same fractions for non-fertilized soil (Table 1).…”
Section: Labilementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Para o fósforo (P) o comportamento se alterou nas médias em profundidade devido a aplicação do nutriente na época do plantio, e dentro dos tratamentos se manteve constante. Isto pode ser explicado pela afirmação de que o P é elemento pouco móvel, permanecendo no local onde foi depositado (OLIVEIRA et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified