2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-06832011000100025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling of the effect of variation of boundary conditions on vadose zone hydraulic properties

Abstract: SUMMARYAn accurate estimation of hydraulic fluxes in the vadose zone is essential for the prediction of water, nutrient and contaminant transport in natural systems. The objective of this study was to simulate the effect of variation of boundary conditions on the estimation of hydraulic properties (i.e. water content, effective unsaturated hydraulic conductivity and hydraulic flux) in a one-dimensional unsaturated flow model domain. Unsaturated one-dimensional vertical water flow was simulated in a pure phase … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It assumes that the solution obtained can meet the specified tolerance level, given the spectral estimation of the observations aligns with the actual conditions at the study site. For a low permeability and faster flow in more permeable soils, the typical range of hydraulic flux may select 10 −6 to 10 −9 and 10 −4 to 10 −5 m/s, respectively (Jougnot et al, 2012; Kool et al, 1987; Leão & Gentry, 2011; Parker, 2003; Wilson, 1983).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It assumes that the solution obtained can meet the specified tolerance level, given the spectral estimation of the observations aligns with the actual conditions at the study site. For a low permeability and faster flow in more permeable soils, the typical range of hydraulic flux may select 10 −6 to 10 −9 and 10 −4 to 10 −5 m/s, respectively (Jougnot et al, 2012; Kool et al, 1987; Leão & Gentry, 2011; Parker, 2003; Wilson, 1983).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It assumes that the solution obtained can meet the specified tolerance level, given the spectral estimation of the observations aligns with the actual conditions at the study site. For a low permeability and faster flow in more permeable soils, the typical range of hydraulic flux may select 10 À6 to 10 À9 and 10 À4 to 10 À5 m/ s, respectively (Jougnot et al, 2012;Kool et al, 1987;Leão & Gentry, 2011;Parker, 2003;Wilson, 1983). Table 1 and Figure 6a delineate the assessment of the internal heat source, considering thermal diffusivity and hydraulic flux within the framework of BC type 1, the specified depth, and notable spectral components within a controlled volume extending 1.2 m. The estimated internal heat (E) ranges from 10 À3 to 10 À5 C/s for diurnal and semi-diurnal patterns.…”
Section: Internal Heat Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%