2003
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-06832003000400019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perdas de solo e água por erosão hídrica influenciadas por métodos de preparo, classes de declive e níveis de fertilidade do solo

Abstract: A erosão é a forma mais prejudicial de degradação do solo. Além de reduzir sua capacidade produtiva para as culturas, ela pode causar sérios danos ambientais, como assoreamento e poluição das fontes de água. Contudo, usando adequados sistemas de manejo do solo e bem planejadas práticas conservacionistas de suporte, os problemas de erosão podem ser satisfatoriamente resolvidos. Com o propósito de obter informações quantitativas sobre o assunto, para servirem de guia nos planejamentos conservacionistas de uso da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0
87

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(1 reference statement)
4
42
0
87
Order By: Relevance
“…The total losses of soil and water showed the following trend: bare soil > millet under downslope tillage > millet under contour seeding> pigeon pea under downslope tillage > jack bean under downslope tillage > pigeon pea under contour seeding > jack bean under contour seeding (Table 4). These results corroborate those of Cogo, Levien and Schwarz (2003), indicating that the plant cover offers the necessary protection to the soil during highly erosive rainfall events.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The total losses of soil and water showed the following trend: bare soil > millet under downslope tillage > millet under contour seeding> pigeon pea under downslope tillage > jack bean under downslope tillage > pigeon pea under contour seeding > jack bean under contour seeding (Table 4). These results corroborate those of Cogo, Levien and Schwarz (2003), indicating that the plant cover offers the necessary protection to the soil during highly erosive rainfall events.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Drainpipes were installed along the lower part of the plots to collect the runoff in two 225 L tanks, interconnected by a Geib divisor with nine windows, where the accumulated water in the second tank corresponds to 1/9 of the total runoff Silva et al, 2005;Castro et al, 2011). Samples were collected as proposed by Cogo et al, (2003), to quantify soil loss after each erosive rainfall event.…”
Section: Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This amount of tillage is considered low and can maintain 30 to 100 % of the soil surface covered with plant residues (Soane et al, 2012). Despite economic and agronomic advantages in terms of reduced fuel consumption (Fernandes et al, 2008) and improved soil erosion control (Cogo et al, 2003), the reduced soil disturbance under NT along with the increased weight of modern agricultural machinery, have caused enough compaction of the soil surface layers to create an obstacle to the expansion of this cultivation system (Siqueira, 2008). In 2012, NT covered an area of 32 million ha in Brazil, a significant proportion of the approximately 117 million ha in the world (FEBRAPDP, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%