1998
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-06831998000400011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Três métodos de cálculo do DRIS para avaliar o potencial de resposta à adubação de árvores de eucalipto

Abstract: RESUMO O objetivo deste trabalho foi testar o efeito de três métodos de cálculo do

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
21
0
16

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
21
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…These contents and the optimum ranges generated by DRIS were compared with contents and sufficiency ranges reported in the literature (Malavolta et al 1997, Hanlon & Hochmuth 2009). The nutritional limitation order was generated in two ways: as a function of the optimum range of the leaf contents or according to the potential response to fertilization (Wadt et al 1998). It sets the percentage of unbalanced fields (deficient or excess) for each nutrient with optimum range of foliar contents and foliar content of nutrients in the samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These contents and the optimum ranges generated by DRIS were compared with contents and sufficiency ranges reported in the literature (Malavolta et al 1997, Hanlon & Hochmuth 2009). The nutritional limitation order was generated in two ways: as a function of the optimum range of the leaf contents or according to the potential response to fertilization (Wadt et al 1998). It sets the percentage of unbalanced fields (deficient or excess) for each nutrient with optimum range of foliar contents and foliar content of nutrients in the samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fields were divided in five groups (positive, positive or null, null, negative or null and negative), according to the potential response to fertilization, in order to generate the nutritional limitation order as a function of the potential response to fertilization (Wadt et al 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DRIS indices were interpreted by the Nutrient Application Potential Response (NAPR) method (Wadt, 1996;Wadt et al, 1998), and were classified into five categories (Table 1). This classification was based on the probability of the best nutrient response in cases where the DRIS indices were the lowest and negative, as well as having a higher nutritional imbalance than other nutrients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DRIS functions; f(A/B) and f(B/A) = DRIS functions in the direct and inverse forms, respectively; and n = number of DRIS functions (f). Subsequently, the mean nutritional balance index (IEN m ) (Wadt et al, 1998b) for the different sites was obtained by summing up the nutrient indices in a module and by dividing this value by the number of analyzed nutrients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the IEN m (Wadt et al, 1998b) calculated for the DRIS, this index was computed for the CND at the different sites. For the DRIS and M-DRIS methods, the function and index calculations were performed with routines developed in Excel 5.0; zN through zMg as well as the CND nutrient indices were also established with Excel 5.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%