2003
DOI: 10.1590/s0080-62342003000100009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliando a confiabilidade interavaliadores de um instrumento para classificação de pacientes: coeficiente Kappa

Abstract: RESUMO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
25

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
19
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…In the category PPE, the tests performed with the instruments to assess validity and reliability were included in various specialties (n=8): Pediatrics (n=3), Psychiatry (n=2) and Neonatology (n=1) ( Table 1). Inter-rater reliability (8,10,(17)(18)(19)(20) Kappa Coefficient (8,10,(18)(19)(20) Pearson Correlation (17,20) Between nurses (17)(18) Nurses, technician and physician versus Pediatrics PCI (19) Perroca (original) (17)(18) Psychiatry (10) Pediatrics (8,19) Perroca (new version) 20 K = 0.68-0.90 (18) ; 0.17 -0.76 (10) ; 0.69-0.84 (19) ; 0.41-0.74 and ≥ 0.75 (8) r = 0.87-0.95 (17) α = 0.87; CCI= 0.89-0.90 (20) Internal reliability and users' opinions (21) Cronbach' alpha (21) Spearman Correlation (21) Perroca original (21) α= 0.94 ; rs = 0.08 to 0.87 (21) Satisfied users; tendency to underestimate the care category (21) . Content validity (2,(7)(8)(9)22) Delphi technic (2,(7)(8)(9)22) Agreement level ≥ 70% (2,(7)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the category PPE, the tests performed with the instruments to assess validity and reliability were included in various specialties (n=8): Pediatrics (n=3), Psychiatry (n=2) and Neonatology (n=1) ( Table 1). Inter-rater reliability (8,10,(17)(18)(19)(20) Kappa Coefficient (8,10,(18)(19)(20) Pearson Correlation (17,20) Between nurses (17)(18) Nurses, technician and physician versus Pediatrics PCI (19) Perroca (original) (17)(18) Psychiatry (10) Pediatrics (8,19) Perroca (new version) 20 K = 0.68-0.90 (18) ; 0.17 -0.76 (10) ; 0.69-0.84 (19) ; 0.41-0.74 and ≥ 0.75 (8) r = 0.87-0.95 (17) α = 0.87; CCI= 0.89-0.90 (20) Internal reliability and users' opinions (21) Cronbach' alpha (21) Spearman Correlation (21) Perroca original (21) α= 0.94 ; rs = 0.08 to 0.87 (21) Satisfied users; tendency to underestimate the care category (21) . Content validity (2,(7)(8)(9)22) Delphi technic (2,(7)(8)(9)22) Agreement level ≥ 70% (2,(7)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers used diverse tests to prove reliability and validity of the instruments: inter-rater reliability (8,10,(17)(18)(19)(20) , predictive ability (6,20) , users' opinion (21) , content validity (2,(7)(8)(9)22) and construct validity (10,(20)(21)23) . The original PCI and its new version were the most subjected to a validation process (2,6,(20)(21)(23)(24) .…”
Section: Lilacs N=808 (Elegible N=20)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of concordance was made according to the suggestion by Altman (1991) and according to the Kappa value: < 0.20 (very low), 0.21-0.40 (low), 0.41-0.60 (moderate), 0.61-0.80 (good) and 0.81-1.00 (very good), as cited by Perroca and Gaidzinski (2003 Wells et al (1995Wells et al ( , 1997, the protocol for prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis from the SBACV cited by Maffei et al (2005) and the predictive method of this study. Table 1 below shows each risk factor related to the thrombotic event probability used in the predictive method as well as the references from the literature used.…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ao longo de anos, o dimensionamento de pessoal de enfermagem tem sido foco, por parte de enfermeiros e administradores de serviços de saúde, por interferir diretamente na eficácia, na qualidade e no custo da assistência à saúde (6) . O modelo para a realização do dimensionamento do pessoal de enfermagem deve considerar como uma das variáveis intervenientes, a complexidade assistencial, identificada por meio da utilização de um instrumento de classificação de pacientes (7) , que estabelece o seu grau de dependência em relação à equipe de enfermagem.…”
unclassified