Técnica Delphi na validação das intervenções de enfermagem

Abstract

O saber, a ciência são universais e vêm se desenvolvendo muito rapidamente e, o enfermeiro, tem conhecimento de sua responsabilidade neste desenvolvimento científico. Com o objetivo de analisar a Técnica Delphi, descrevendo a sua utilização na validação das intervenções de enfermagem aos lesados medulares em reabilitação, foi possível resultados fidedignos, por meio de uma técnica de caráter flexível e, sobretudo, por valorizar a opinião ou o conhecimento de cada um dos enfermeiros que atuam junto aos lesados medulares. Delphi permitiu aos especialistas apontarem as intervenções preconizadas a esta clientela, mas este contexto teve requisitos necessários que identificam o pensar-fazer em enfermagem.

Elaboração e validação de um manual informativo sobre cateterismo cardíaco

“…Participants signed the consent form. The number of experts included depends on the phenomenon to be studied; (16) in our study we used the same number of experts used in another study. (9) We requested that nurses read and suggest changes to the content in order to improve the clarity (coherence) and language (appropriate language for the patient) of each topic of the manual.…”

Validation of mapping of care actions prescribed for orthopedic patients onto the nursing interventions classification

“…This technique permits obtaining consensus in a group regarding a certain phenomenon (8) . The group is composed of experts, that is, professionals effectively engaged in the field in which the study is developed.…”

Superficial peripheral vein type classification of adolescents, adults and elderly according to the Delphi technique

“…In the preliminary version, the instrument presented the different types of designations for the veins (definitions and titles), formatted according to a fivepoint Likert scale (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) for the equalization of these devices in Brazil (17) . For the visibility criterion, we adopted the inspection concepts, that is, resources characterized by a body structure, systemized and identified by vision, while equipped inspection referred to the use of any material in the observation process.…”

“…In the preliminary version, the instrument presented the different types of designations for the veins (definitions and titles), formatted according to a fivepoint Likert scale (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) (1 = completely irrelevant/ inadequate; 2 = moderately irrelevant/inadequate; 3 = relevance/adequacy level similar to irrelevance/ or the use of indicated or self determined medicine a n d / o r i t s u n d e s i r a b l e e f f e c t s ( p u n c t u r e s , transfixions). Thus, they do not present inspection, palpation or measurement detectable evidences of content extravasation, nor is it possible to identify…”