2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762007000500001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[No Title Available]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These results raise questions on (i) the identity of the Mexican strains that displayed restriction patterns that were not compatible with any of the restriction patterns of the reference strains used in this study but suggesting coinfections, (ii) the pathogenicity of these strains, and (iii) their geographic distribution [23]. In order to answer these questions and to establish the identity of the Mexican Leishmania strains and their geographical distribution, it would be necessary, following the methodology developed by Van der et al [24], to analyze several single-locus markers sequencing of the Mexican Leishmania strains from most of the endemic areas of Mexico and from patients with all the clinical manifestations of CL (LCL, MCL, and DCL).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results raise questions on (i) the identity of the Mexican strains that displayed restriction patterns that were not compatible with any of the restriction patterns of the reference strains used in this study but suggesting coinfections, (ii) the pathogenicity of these strains, and (iii) their geographic distribution [23]. In order to answer these questions and to establish the identity of the Mexican Leishmania strains and their geographical distribution, it would be necessary, following the methodology developed by Van der et al [24], to analyze several single-locus markers sequencing of the Mexican Leishmania strains from most of the endemic areas of Mexico and from patients with all the clinical manifestations of CL (LCL, MCL, and DCL).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“Cured” patients have been reported to become parasite positive again 1-30 years after treatment. [19] Vaccine development continues, but at present, no effective vaccine is commercially available. Therefore, prevention of exposure to infected sand flies is a primary means of interrupting disease transmission.…”
Section: The Parasite and Clinical Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parasite is transmitted through the bite of infected female phlebotomine sand flies. The prevalence of VL has been expanding throughout the world [1], and Brazil is one of six countries that account for 90% of all recorded human VL cases worldwide [2]. VL is the most severe clinical manifestation of Leishmania infection and it has high lethality in cases without suitable treatment [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%