2000
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762000000400004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sexing sand fly pupae (Diptera: Psychodidade: Phlebotominae)

Abstract: We describe a technique to separate male and female pupae of sand flies. This has reduced the labour to separate flies after emergence and also allows the isolation of unmated adults for behavioural and physiological studies.Key words: Insecta -sand flies -sex -pupae -morphology Manipulation of adult sand flies involving aspiration and transfer between recipients is stressful to the insect and the separation of large numbers of male and females is a laborious and timeconsuming job. Damage to the insects is als… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Separation of unmated individuals by sex in the adult stage may be difficult because mating can pass unnoticed, forcing the researcher to be aware of the moment they molt into adults to be rapidly removed (Brazil & Brazil 2000). For small experiments this can be a manageable task, by placing larvae or pupae in separate vials (Dame et al 1974).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separation of unmated individuals by sex in the adult stage may be difficult because mating can pass unnoticed, forcing the researcher to be aware of the moment they molt into adults to be rapidly removed (Brazil & Brazil 2000). For small experiments this can be a manageable task, by placing larvae or pupae in separate vials (Dame et al 1974).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When pupation occurred the specimens were sexed as described by Brazil and Brazil (2000) and transferred individually to emergence vials. The vials were numbered and emergence of the insects monitored at hourly intervals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%