1998
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761998000400016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunodiagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas' Disease) Infection in Naturally Infected Dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These included groups of (A) healthy dogs (N = 80) and (B) ill dogs (N = 41), affected by infectious and other diseases including distemper, brucellosis, bacterial infections, and noninfectious pathologies as neoplasm, anemias, renal failure, urolithiasis, Cushing syndrome, heart disease, vestibular syndrome, prolapsed organs, and inflammatory diseases; group 2: Trypanosoma cruzi-infected dogs (N = 108) from rural areas of Santiago del Estero and Chaco, both endemic Argentinean provinces for Chagas disease, which were diagnosed using two or three serological tests. 19,20 Group 3 corresponds to T. cruzi-noninfected dogs living in Chaco (N = 71) in the same area as those dogs mentioned in group 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These included groups of (A) healthy dogs (N = 80) and (B) ill dogs (N = 41), affected by infectious and other diseases including distemper, brucellosis, bacterial infections, and noninfectious pathologies as neoplasm, anemias, renal failure, urolithiasis, Cushing syndrome, heart disease, vestibular syndrome, prolapsed organs, and inflammatory diseases; group 2: Trypanosoma cruzi-infected dogs (N = 108) from rural areas of Santiago del Estero and Chaco, both endemic Argentinean provinces for Chagas disease, which were diagnosed using two or three serological tests. 19,20 Group 3 corresponds to T. cruzi-noninfected dogs living in Chaco (N = 71) in the same area as those dogs mentioned in group 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trypanosoma cruzi serology in dogs was performed by using T. cruzi antigens in IFA, ELISA, and indirect hemaglutination assay to evaluate the infection status of dogs. 19 VL serology in dogs was performed using rK39 ICT (Kalazar Detect Canine Rapid Test, lot no. JM 1062 and PM 1020 from Inbios International, Inc., Seattle, WA) with manufacturer's instructions to process 151/167 case sera samples and 296/300 VL noninfected control dog sera.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of antibodies to T. cruzi by the indirect haemagglutination test (IHA; Polychaco, Argentina), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the immunofluorescent antibody tests (IFAT, in a subsample) was as described by Lauricella et al (1998). Seroreactivity for T. cruzi of dog sera was demonstrated by ELISA readings of 0·2 or greater and IFAT and IHA titres of 1 : 16 or greater; sensitivity was estimated as 94%, 94% and 68%, whereas specificity was 96·2%, 100% and 100%, respectively.…”
Section: Sero-parasitological Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sera from dogs were tested for antibodies to T. cruzi by indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA; Polychaco, Buenos Aires, Argentina), indirect immunofluorescence test (IFAT) and enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using standardized procedures and criteria reported elsewhere (Lauricella et al, 1998). Sera from cat were tested for antibodies to T. cruzi by IHA (Polychaco, Buenos Aires, Argentina), IFAT (total antigamma LID, Laboratorio Inmunodiagnóstico, Buenos Aires, Argentina) and ELISA (goat anti-cat IgG HRP, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, California).…”
Section: Serodiagnosis and Xenodiagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sera from cat were tested for antibodies to T. cruzi by IHA (Polychaco, Buenos Aires, Argentina), IFAT (total antigamma LID, Laboratorio Inmunodiagnóstico, Buenos Aires, Argentina) and ELISA (goat anti-cat IgG HRP, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, California). Titers ≥1:16 (IHA and IFAT) or an optical absorbance ≥0.2 (ELISA) were used as cutoff values for dogs and cats (Lauricella et al, 1998). Xenodiagnosis was performed using 20 laboratory-reared, third-or fourth-instar nymphs of T. infestans per animal for 25 minutes .…”
Section: Serodiagnosis and Xenodiagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%