1994
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761994000200008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description of Lutzomyia (Evandromyia) sipani, a new species of Sand Fly (Diptera: Psychodidae) from Loreto Department, Peru

Abstract: Lutzomyia sipani n.sp. is described from males collected in Loreto Department, Peru. The new species belongs to the subgenus Evandromyia mangabeira and confirms the presence of this group in Peru

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The new record for Brazil, Ev. sipani, was collected at Vila Falcão and has only been previously recorded in the Amazonian lowlands of Peru and Colombia (Fernandez et al 1994, Barreto et al 2000. With these two new records, the total of recorded sandfly species in AM increases from 131 to 133.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The new record for Brazil, Ev. sipani, was collected at Vila Falcão and has only been previously recorded in the Amazonian lowlands of Peru and Colombia (Fernandez et al 1994, Barreto et al 2000. With these two new records, the total of recorded sandfly species in AM increases from 131 to 133.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The former is a recently described species from Peru (Fernández et al 1994) based only on males. Our female was found in a different locality from the male and it was impossible to distinguish it from L. bourrouli…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…124 G), and the typical form in which this process is absent (their Figs 124 E, H). In the same year (Fernandez et al 1994) an addi-tional species belonging to the Series infraspinosa, L. sipani, was described from males collected in Loreto Department, northeast Peru. Barrett et al (1996) illustrated the male terminalia of yet another form which in the key of Young and Duncan (1994, p. 303) runs to L. infraspinosa, and which they considered to be a distinct species, without formally naming it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%