1992
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761992000500021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eimeria oocysts in deer coprolites dated from 9,000 years BP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the absence of a well documented fossil record (Stevens et al 2001), protozoa have been found in archaeological material (Ferreira et al 1992): amastigote pseudocysts were found by Fornaciari et al (1992), antigens were identified (Allisson et al 1999), and DNA recovered from mummified bodies (Cantarino et al 1998, Guhl et al 2000.…”
Section: Parasite Evolution and Paleoparasitologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the absence of a well documented fossil record (Stevens et al 2001), protozoa have been found in archaeological material (Ferreira et al 1992): amastigote pseudocysts were found by Fornaciari et al (1992), antigens were identified (Allisson et al 1999), and DNA recovered from mummified bodies (Cantarino et al 1998, Guhl et al 2000.…”
Section: Parasite Evolution and Paleoparasitologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are not many well-documented papers referring to protozoa in coprolites (Witenberg, 1961;Fouant et al, 1982;Faulkner et al, 1989;Ferreira et al, 1992;Allison et al, 1999). Even in fresh feces, in order to obtain a reliable result of giardiasis by direct examination, one should examine at least a series of 3 or more stool samples, as cysts of G. duodenalis are shed from the intestinal tract on a periodic basis.…”
Section: Carvalho Gonçalves Et Al In Trans Royal Society Of Tropicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first such report refers to oocysts in deer coprolites dated to 9000 BP from northeastern Brazil, for which a new species (Eimeria lobatoi) was suggested (Ferreira et al 1992) and oocysts of Eimeria macusaniensis and Eimeria ivitaensis have been detected in mummified camelids from Peru (Leguía et al 1995, Leguía 1999. More recently, E. macusaniensis was recovered from various archaeological sites in Santa Cruz, Argentina (Fugassa & Barberena 2006, Fugassa & Guichón 2006, Fugassa 2007, Beltrame et al 2010, where the host specificity of this species enabled more reliable identification of camelids in archaeological deposits.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Studies On Protozoa In Ancient Remainsmentioning
confidence: 99%