1985
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761985000400014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspectos da ecologia dos flebótomos do Parque Nacional da Serra dos Orgãos, Rio de Janeiro: IV. Frequência mensal em armadilhas luminosas (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotominae)

Abstract: Durante dois anos completos - outubro de 1981 a setembro de 1983 - capturamos flebótomos em armadilhas luminosas no Parque Nacional da Serra dos Órgãos. As armadilhas eram colocadas, semanalmente, em pontos estratégicos na floresta, sempre no mesmo local e hora, ficando expostas por 12 horas. Foram gastas 732 horas e obtidos 2.730 flebótomos pertencentes a 17 espécies, quatro do gênero Brumptomyia França & Parrot, 1921 e 13 do gênero Lutzomyia França, 1924. a proporção de machos em relação ao número total foi … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
18
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…ayrozai is not considered highly anthropophilic in the state of Pará (Lainson et al 1994;Lainson and Shaw 1998), most infections by L. (V.) naiffi are transmitted by this vector. In the regions of the southeast of Brazil, this sand fly specie is considered highly anthropophilic (Aguiar and Soucasaux 1984), as in Serra dos Órgãos, Rio de Janeiro (Aguiar et al 1985) and in Vale do Ribeira, São Paulo state (Gomes and Galati 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ayrozai is not considered highly anthropophilic in the state of Pará (Lainson et al 1994;Lainson and Shaw 1998), most infections by L. (V.) naiffi are transmitted by this vector. In the regions of the southeast of Brazil, this sand fly specie is considered highly anthropophilic (Aguiar and Soucasaux 1984), as in Serra dos Órgãos, Rio de Janeiro (Aguiar et al 1985) and in Vale do Ribeira, São Paulo state (Gomes and Galati 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The light trap CDC type has been systematically used in studies on sand flies in forest areas and/or in areas where there is leishmaniasis transmission , Aguiar et al 1985a, Gomes & Galati 1987, Dourado et al 1989, Azevedo & Rangel 1991, Azevedo et al 1993, Galati et al 1996, Brazil et al 2000, Barros et al 2000. In spite of the fact that this kind of collection does not allow access to the great number of species, which may constitute the local fauna (Shaw & Lainson 1972) Martins et al 1978, Young & Duncan 1994.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sand flies were captured in houses, on the inside and outside walls, using manual aspirators; at peridomestic sites (up to 10m from houses) using manual aspirators on equines, and by CDC light traps (Sudia & Chamberlain 1962, Gomes et al 1985, Natal et al 1991 in domestic animal shelters. In cocoa plantations, a Shannon trap (Sherlock & Pessoa 1964) was used for collections up to 50m and 100m from houses, and a Falcão light trap (Falcão 1981, Aguiar et al 1985 was used only to capture 100m from houses. The degree of anthropophily was determined by considering the number of females collected bitting man, in peridomestic sites and in cocoa plantations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%