Currently, there are 6 recognized species in the genus Rhopalias. These parasites are found in the small intestines of numerous species of marsupials throughout North and South America. Small mistakes in various classical taxonomic works have given rise to recent and numerous misidentifications of these species. In this work, we examine a total of 99 specimens across all species from museum collections in an attempt to determine informative taxonomic characters to distinguish these species. Despite confusion in the literature, accurate identification of these species can be achieved by observing the presence or absence of oral and flanking spines anterior to the oral sucker. Species of Rhopalias (Trematoda: Rhopalidae) occur in the small intestines of marsupials throughout the Nearctic and Neotropical regions. Six species are currently recognized as valid. Rudolphi (1819) described Distoma coronatum from Didelphis marsupialis Linnaeus, 1758 collected by Johann Natterer in Brazil. Diesing (1850) described Rhopalophorus horridus from Chironectes minimus (Zimmermann, 1780) also collected by Natterer. Stiles and Hassall (1898) recognized that Rhopalophorus was an occupied name, and renamed the genus Rhopalias. Braun (1901) provided formal descriptions of both previously described species, and recognized and described another species, Rhopalias baculifer, from the same material examined by Diesing (1850). Chandler (1932) described Rhopalias macracanthus from North America in Didelphis virginiana Kerr, 1792. Kifune and Uyema (1982) described Rhopalias caballeroi from D. marsupialis and Philander opossum (Linnaeus, 1758) in Brazil. Finally, Rivallis et al. (2004) described the most recent species in this genus, Rhopalias caucensis from P. opossum collected in Colombia. Skrjabin (1948) reproduced the descriptions of the species in the genus and provided an identification key to the known species of Rhopalias in that work, it is apparent that the labels for the figures referring to R. baculifer and R. horridus were reversed. Travassos et al. (1969) reproduced the work of Skrjabin (1948), along with the mislabeled figures. In the summary work of Yamaguti (1971), Figure 1651 of Rhopalias coronatus is a reproduction of R. horridus after Caballero (1946); this figure is in fact a representation of the currently recognized species R. caballeroi. In the same work (Yamaguti, 1971), Figure 1650B of R. coronatus, after Caballero (1946), but attributed to Braun (1901), also appears to be a drawing of R. caballeroi, but because the tentacles are covering the area where flanking spines would be found, identification to species is not possible from the Figure (although it is likely R. caballeroi). Finally, Radev et al. (2005) offer original figures of R. macracanthus drawn from specimens stored in the Manter Laboratory of Parasitology (HWML 0844, 22422, 22423). These specimens have been verified by 1 of us (T.R.H.) as R. macracanthus, but the figures of these specimens in Radev et al. (2005) lack the defining flanking spines, making t...