1961
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761961000100001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sôbre algumas espécies do gênero Litomosoides Chandler, 1931: (Nematoda, Filarioidea)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some males and females presented longer buccal capsules (35 and 40, respectively), and most of the males examined had an adcloacal pair of papillae and 1 pair of asymmetric post-cloacal papillae. This subspecies has been reported from G. soricina from Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, and Venezuela (Sandground, 1934;Chitwood, 1938;Rego, 1961;Esslinger, 1973;Guerrero et al, 2002). It represents the first record for the species in Bolivia.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some males and females presented longer buccal capsules (35 and 40, respectively), and most of the males examined had an adcloacal pair of papillae and 1 pair of asymmetric post-cloacal papillae. This subspecies has been reported from G. soricina from Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, and Venezuela (Sandground, 1934;Chitwood, 1938;Rego, 1961;Esslinger, 1973;Guerrero et al, 2002). It represents the first record for the species in Bolivia.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…After re-examination of the type material, Bain et al (2003) suggested 2 subspecies for L. hamletti, i.e., Litomosoides hamletti hamletti to include the specimens of Sandground (1934), Rego (1961), Esslinger (1973), and Guerrero et al (2002)-mentioned as L. guiterasi-and L. hamletti penai to include the specimens of Jiménez-Quiró s and Arroyo (1960)-mentioned as L. penai. The justification is that because females of the latter subspecies are longer, the vulva is located posterior to the esophagointestinal junction, and the tail is more attenuated.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: L. guiterasi (Vigueras, 1934), L. molossi Esslinger, 1973, and L. chandleri Esslinger, 1973 are smaller species, with shorter spicules and microfilariae displaying the last nucleus at the tip of tail (Vigueras, 1934;Esslinger, 1973). Moreover, from the re-descriptions by Sandground (1934), Rego (1961), and Esslinger (1973), L. guiterasi has a shorter tail in both sexes, a truncated extremity in female worms, and vulva at the level of the esophagus. Litomosoides molossi has a shorter buccal capsule, no cloacal papillae in the male, and a thinner microfilaria (mean of 3 vs. 4.7).…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…in Brasil, was subsequently assigned to specimens from diverse microchiropterans from South American geographic areas. However the redescriptions (Rego, 1961; Diaz-Ungria, 1963; Esslinger, 1973; Guerrero et al , 2002) were not all similar, particularly in the morphology of the buccal capsule and, when studied in ventral view, the arrangement of caudal papillae (Diaz-Ungria, 1963; Guerrero et al , 2002). Consequently, Guerrero et al (2002) suggested that the taxon L. brasiliensis was very likely a complex of species and they prefered not to place L. brasiliensis in synonymy with the oldest taxon, L. serpicula .…”
Section: Morphological Analysis Of the Type Materials And Taxonomic Cmentioning
confidence: 99%