Stenopodíneos da coleção do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz: (3ª nota)

A new species of Kodormus Barber, with a redescription of the genus, taxonomic notes, and a key to the species of the genus (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Reduviidae, Stenopodainae)

“… Kodormus Barber, 1930: 151 [key], 213–214 [description]; Costa Lima 1940 : 166, footnote [ Kodormus considered identical to Otiodactylus Pinto, 1927]; Costa Lima 1941 : 337–338 [ Kodormus recognized as diverse from Otiodactylus but alleged as possessing the same characteristics of Ocrioessa Bergroth, 1918]; Costa Lima and Campos Seabra 1944: 507 [ Kodormus recognized as distinct from Ocrioessa ], 510 [key]; Costa Lima and Campos Seabra 1945 : 159 [checklist]; Wygodzinsky 1949 : 66 [catalog]; Putshkov and Putshkov 1985 : 104 [catalog]; Giacchi 1985 : 68–69 [redescription]; Maldonado 1990 : 506 [catalog]; Wygodzinsky and Giacchi 1994 : 7 [key], 8 [checklist]; Bérenger and Maldonado 1996 : 37 [comparison with other genera]; Froeschner 1999 : 227 [catalog]; Forero 2004 : 166 [diagnosis], 167 [new record from Colombia], 191 [key]; Gil-Santana et al 2015 : 337 [citation], 341 [key]; Gil-Santana and Oliveira 2016 : 501, 502 [citations], 505 [key]. …”

“… Kodormus barberi ; Costa Lima and Campos Seabra 1944: 507 [new combination]; Costa Lima and Campos Seabra 1945 : 159 [checklist; new combination reinforced]; Wygodzinsky 1949 : 66 [catalog]; Maldonado 1990 : 506 [catalog]; Bérenger and Maldonado 1996 : 35 [citation], figs 9, 37 [distinguishing features]; Gil-Santana and Alencar 2001 : 173 [checklist; as a misidentification of K. davidmartinsi sp. nov.; see below]; Forero 2004 : 166 [citation].…”

“…Despite these statements, Costa Lima (1941) did not propose any formal synonym between Ocrioessa and Kodormus . Costa Lima and Campos Seabra (1944), however, concluded that Kodormus was really distinct from Ocrioessa , establishing the new combination, Kodormus barberi , which was reinforced by Costa Lima and Campos Seabra (1945) .…”