1935
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761935000800004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capillariinae de animaes de sangue frio: (Nematoda: Trichuroidea)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other reported host: Ninia hudsoni Parker, 1940 (Dipsadidae) (McAllister et al, 2010). Other locality records: Rio de Janeiro, RJ (Freitas & Lent, 1935); Pastaza Province, Ecuador (McAllister et al, 2010 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other reported host: Ninia hudsoni Parker, 1940 (Dipsadidae) (McAllister et al, 2010). Other locality records: Rio de Janeiro, RJ (Freitas & Lent, 1935); Pastaza Province, Ecuador (McAllister et al, 2010 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas all species of Capillostrongyloides have been reported from fishes, those of Paracapillaria parasitize fishes and amphibians (subgenus Paracapillaria Mendonça), reptiles (snakes) (subgenus Ophidiocapillaria Moravec), and a single species, P. philippinensis (Chitwood, Velasquez and Salazar), is known from birds and mammals including man (subgenus Crossicapillaria Moravec) (see Moravec 2001a,b, Timi et al 2007). Freitas and Lent (1935) erected Capillostrongyloides to accommodate the species Capillostrongyloides zederi Freitas and Lent, and Capillostrongyloides minima (Travassos, Artigas and Pereira), and they characterized it by the generally small measurements of the body and a small number of eggs in the uterus in females. However, according to Moravec (1982), these characters cannot be taken for generic criteria.…”
Section: Taxonomic Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was mentioned above that the only record of Paratrichosoma recurvum is that reported by Solger (1877Solger ( , 1933, who found females of this parasite in the skin of an unidenti®ed crocodile bought in the naturalist's store, probably Crocodylus acutus, allegedly imported from Mexico. In their monograph on capillariids, Skryabin et al (1957) have reported Crocodilus americanus and C. acutus to be the hosts of this parasite, which is evidently an error; C. americanus Laurenti was considered by Freitas and Lent (1935) and Lo pez-Neyra (1947) to be a valid name for C. acutus and, apparently, their information was misinterpreted by Skryabin et al (1957), who took these two synonyms to be the names of two independent species. The present ®nding of P. recurvum in C. moreletii represents a new host record.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%