2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0066-782x2007000200016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognóstico da esclerose valvar aórtica na mortalidade cardíaca de pacientes atendidos no instituto de cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul

Abstract: The presence of aortic valve sclerosis was not associated with increased risk for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the population studied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the pathological results found on Doppler echocardiography, a compromised left ventricular systolic function had a prevalence of 9.5%, inferior to that reported by Rosa et al 10 who registered a prevalence of 17.2% with a strong statistical significance in both studies (p < 0.001).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the pathological results found on Doppler echocardiography, a compromised left ventricular systolic function had a prevalence of 9.5%, inferior to that reported by Rosa et al 10 who registered a prevalence of 17.2% with a strong statistical significance in both studies (p < 0.001).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…In the studied cohort, we could observe a balance between the prevalence of AVS in males and females (17.3% / 19.4%), which is consistent with findings from other studies. Also, the advanced mean age observed (67.5 years) confirms that AVS, as a degenerative pathology, affects mainly older age groups 10 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In 2006, a second study on more than 3,500 community-dwelling adults with a mean age of 76 years, found similar results with a 23% increase in the risk of all-cause mortality in AVSc patients ( 20 ). In contrast, a successive study, evaluating more than 8,500 community-dwelling adults with a mean age of 56 years, showed that there was no association between AVSc presence and all-cause mortality ( 21 ). However, the last study, even if performed on a larger cohort, had an overall mortality of 3.5%, while in the two previous ones it was around 15%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the general population, AVSc is a rather common feature, with a prevalence ranging from 30 to 40% [1,3,13] and AVSc has been associated with an increased risk of all-cause and CV mortality in many [5,6,14,15,16,17,18,19] but not all [20] studies. Several authors have shown that the risk of dying from any-cause or for CV reasons in subjects with AVSc is significantly greater than in those without, even after adjustment for several risk factors [6,14,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have shown that the risk of dying from any-cause or for CV reasons in subjects with AVSc is significantly greater than in those without, even after adjustment for several risk factors [6,14,21]. Other authors, however, have shown that such increased-risk is totally eliminated when analyses were adjusted for CV risk factors [20]. AVSc, alone or included into cardiac calcium scores, also confers a greater risk of all-cause and CV mortality in subjects with no history of CV disease [14], in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus with or without history of myocardial infarction [16], and in patients hospitalized for overt or suspected CAD [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%