1987
DOI: 10.1590/s0037-86821987000100004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of bacterial contamination of rattlesnake venom

Abstract: The authors studied the bacterial contamination of rattlesnake venom isolated from snakes in captivity and wild snakes caught recently. The captive snakes showed a relatively high incidence of bacterial contamination of their venom.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…23,24,25,26 It is tempting to speculate that crotamine and isoforms 27 or paralogs such as crotasin 28 may have a complementary antimicrobial spectrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24,25,26 It is tempting to speculate that crotamine and isoforms 27 or paralogs such as crotasin 28 may have a complementary antimicrobial spectrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, no β-defensins tested in this study showed antibacterial activity against M. morganii nor K. pneumoniae. Although bacteria were also isolated from the venom of C. durissus terrificus [35], envenomations by this species (C. durissus terrificus) do not usually cause infection or macroscopic necrosis in the bite site [34]. The toxins present in C. durissus terrificus venom: crotamine, PLA 2 , LAAO [36], and cathelicidins [22] could help the asepsis snakebite wound.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las metas en el manejo inicial del ofidismo deberían estar dirigidas a retardar la absorción del veneno (19,21), eliminar el veneno del organismo por medios mecánicos, neutralizar el veneno (3,19,22), aliviar los síntomas y prevenir las complicaciones (20,23). Para lograr esto las medidas que han demostrado mejores efectos a corto y largo plazo son la inmovilización del miembro afectado, que resulta crucial para aminorar la diseminación del veneno a nivel sistémico (2,5) y la colocación de una ligadura proximal, mas no un torniquete que puede producir una disminución importante del flujo sanguíneo en el miembro afectado aumentando así el riesgo de complicaciones locales en especial por necrosis de los tejidos y alteraciones de coagulación (22,24,25).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified