2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0036-46652007000100010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the in vitro activity of six antimicrobial agents against Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Abstract: SUMMARYUse of antimicrobials for the treatment of gonorrhea started in 1930 with the utilization of sulfonamides. With the years other drugs were used for its treatment such as penicillin, tetracycline, spectinomycin, and others. Although highly specific in the beginning, these drugs, with time did not show anymore the expected therapeutic results because of aspects of chromosomal and plasmid-mediated resistance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains to s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, cefoxitin used to treat probable cholecystitis did not prove efficient against gonococcal syndrome although it is considered in vitro active. This underlies the fact that the efficacy of an antibiotic is not determined only by antibiotic pharmacodynamics but is based on pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics index, which was possibly not fulfilled in this case [4]. On the other hand, although azithromycin was resistant in vitro, it was included in the therapeutic regimen at least for a potential broader and enhanced activity given the rapid evolution of the clinical condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, cefoxitin used to treat probable cholecystitis did not prove efficient against gonococcal syndrome although it is considered in vitro active. This underlies the fact that the efficacy of an antibiotic is not determined only by antibiotic pharmacodynamics but is based on pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics index, which was possibly not fulfilled in this case [4]. On the other hand, although azithromycin was resistant in vitro, it was included in the therapeutic regimen at least for a potential broader and enhanced activity given the rapid evolution of the clinical condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%