1991
DOI: 10.1590/s0036-46651991000100007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for measles antibody: a comparison with haemagglutination inhibition, immunofluorescence and plaque neutralization tests

Abstract: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for measles antibodies was compared with Plaque Neutralization (PRN), Haemagglutination inhibition (HI) and Fluorescent antibody (IFA) tests in 181 sera from vaccinated children and umbilical cord. Of 179 positive samples by the sensitive PRN, only two, with titers of 8, were negative by ELISA (copositivity of 98.9%). IFA and HI presented, respectively, copo-sitivities of 93.3% and 82.7%. The ELISA presented a high sensitivity as well as a good reproducibility and r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
7

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Measles IgG antibodies were detected by an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as previously described (30). Antimeasles IgG antibody titers, expressed as milli-international units per milliliter, were estimated with serial dilutions of a reference serum provided by the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (Hertford, England) that were included in each run of our enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measles IgG antibodies were detected by an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as previously described (30). Antimeasles IgG antibody titers, expressed as milli-international units per milliliter, were estimated with serial dilutions of a reference serum provided by the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (Hertford, England) that were included in each run of our enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the questionnaires regarding the relationships between students revealed detailed behavioral patterns of students, and these actions were related to the division into groups 2 and 3 (data in preparation for publication). [14][15][16][17][18]. Many of these reports suggested the HI test was lower in sensitivity than EIA because falsenegative results were demonstrated in the HI test.…”
Section: Post-exposure Hi Titersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizou-se os dados antropomé-tricos da tabela de peso e altura de Santo André 74 . Os lactentes foram divididos em dois grupos: Grupo I (eutró-ficos) e Grupo II (desnutridos de 1°, 2° e 3° graus).…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…A reação de NP, considerada como "padrão ouro", não foi realizada. Não se pode, portanto, aferir a sensibilidade de cada método individualmente, como no estudo realizado por Souza et al (1991) 75 .…”
Section: Crianças Estudadasunclassified