Atividade física de gestantes e desfechos ao recém-nascido: revisão sistemática

Takito, Mônica Yuri; Benício, Maria Helena D’Aquino; Neri, Lenycia de Cassya Lopes

doi:10.1590/s0034-89102009005000074

Cited by 23 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This reflects the lack of accumulated evidence from well-designed studies on vigorous activity and pregnancy outcomes 30 . To date, most studies on vigorous intensity physical activity during pregnancy are laboratory based or observational, often with insufficient statistical power to detect findings on relatively rare outcomes.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Guidelines for Physical Activity During Pregnancy

Evenson

Barakat

Brown

et al. 2013

American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine

256

200

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Women attain numerous benefits from physical activity during pregnancy. However, due to physical changes that occur during pregnancy, special precautions are also needed. This review summarizes current guidelines for physical activity among pregnant women worldwide. Methods We searched PubMed (MedLINE) for country-specific governmental and clinical guidelines on physical activity during pregnancy through the year 2012. We cross-referenced with articles referring to guidelines, with only the most recent included. An abstraction form was used to extract key details and summarize. Results In total, 11 guidelines were identified from nine countries (Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Japan, Norway, Spain, United Kingdom, United States). Most guidelines supported moderate intensity physical activity during pregnancy (10/11) and indicated specific frequency (9/11) and duration/time (9/11) recommendations. Most guidelines provided advice on initiating an exercise program during pregnancy (10/11). Six guidelines included absolute and relative contraindications to exercise. All guidelines generally ruled-out sports with risks of falls, trauma, or collisions. Six guidelines included indications for stopping exercise during pregnancy. Conclusion This review contrasted pregnancy-related physical activity guidelines from around the world, and can help to inform new guidelines as they are created or updated, and facilitate the development of a worldwide guideline.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Guidelines for Physical Activity During Pregnancy

Evenson

Barakat

Brown

et al. 2013

American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine

256

200

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several reviews545556575859606162 of observational studies investigated the associations of non-occupational PA during pregnancy with the risk of PTB. While most of them concentrated on leisure-time PA, only three discussed different domains of non-occupational PA during pregnancy in relation to the risk of PTB555657.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Non-occupational physical activity during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth: a meta-analysis of observational and interventional studies

Wen

Xun

Chen

et al. 2017

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between non-occupational physical activity (PA) during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth (PTB). By searching PubMed and EMBASE from inception to August 20, 2016, 25 observational studies (18 cohorts and 7 case-controls) and 12 interventional studies were identified. Comparing the highest to the lowest category of leisure-time PA during pregnancy, the pooled relative risk (RR) of PTB was 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.74–0.93] for cohort studies and 0.60 (95% CI = 0.43–0.84) for case-control studies. No overall significant association was found between domestic or commuting PA and the risk of PTB. In addition, PA intervention did not indicate significant beneficial effect on the risk of PTB. Evidence from the observational studies suggested that leisure-time, but not domestic or commuting, PA during pregnancy was inversely associated with the risk of PTB. The findings were not supported by small-scale and short-term interventional studies. Further research with objective measurement on leisure-time PA is warranted.

show abstract

“…Factors that have previously been found to contribute to intrauterine growth have included maternal nutrition (Belkacemi, Nelson, Desai, & Ross, 2010; Imdad & Bhutta, 2011) and placental development (Belkacemi et al, 2010), physical activity during pregnancy (Takito, Benicio, & Neri Lde, 2009), psychosocial stress (Littleton, Bye, Buck, & Amacker, 2010), and tobacco exposure (Suter, Abramovici, & Aagaard-Tillery, 2010), among others. Indeed, it appears that there may be complex relations between prenatal smoking exposure and the phenotypes of interest in the current investigation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does low birth weight share common genetic or environmental risk with childhood disruptive disorders?

Ficks¹,

Lahey

Waldman

2013

Journal of Abnormal Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although advances in neonatal care over the past century have resulted in increased rates of survival among at-risk births, including infants with low birth weight, we have much to learn about the psychological outcomes in this population. In particular, although it appears that there is growing evidence that low birth weight may be associated with an increased risk for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD) symptoms in childhood, few studies have examined birth weight as a risk factor for disruptive disorders that commonly co-occur with ADHD [e.g. Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) or Conduct Disorder (CD)]. In addition, the etiology of the relation between birth weight and these disorders is unknown. The current investigation aimed to better understand the putative role of birth weight in disruptive behavior disorders in the context of potentially confounding genetic and environmental influences by examining phenotypic associations between birth weight and disruptive disorder symptoms across families (using generalized linear models with generalized estimating equations) as well as within families (using linear regression) in two independent twin samples (Sample 1: N = 1676 individuals; Sample 2: N = 4038 individuals). We found negative associations between birth weight and several childhood disruptive disorder symptom dimensions, including inattentive, hyperactive-impulsive, and broad externalizing symptoms in both samples. Nonetheless, the overall magnitude of these associations was very small, contributing to less than 1% of the variance in these symptom dimensions. Within-family associations between birth weight and disruptive disorder symptoms did not differ for monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs, suggesting that nonshared environmental influences rather than common genetic influences are responsible for these associations. These consistent albeit weak associations between birth weight and disruptive disorder symptoms suggest that, at least in the general population, low birth weight does not represent a major risk factor in the development of these symptoms.

show abstract

Atividade física de gestantes e desfechos ao recém-nascido: revisão sistemática

Cited by 23 publications

References 71 publications

Guidelines for Physical Activity During Pregnancy

Guidelines for Physical Activity During Pregnancy

Non-occupational physical activity during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth: a meta-analysis of observational and interventional studies

Does low birth weight share common genetic or environmental risk with childhood disruptive disorders?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About