2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89102008000400003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comorbidity adjustment index for the international classification of diseases, 10

Abstract: METHODS:Clinical conditions and weights were adapted from the International Classifi cation of Diseases, 10th revision and applied to a single hospital admission diagnosis. The study included 3,733 patients over 18 years of age who were admitted to a public general hospital in the city of Rio de Janeiro, southeast Brazil, between Jan 2001 and Jan 2003. The index distribution was analyzed by gender, type of admission, blood transfusion, intensive care unit admission, age and length of hospital stay. Two logisti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical conditions were classified with a modified version of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) on the basis of hospital discharge International Classification Disease 10 th version (ICD-10) codes. This Charlson-like index uses a single hospital diagnosis based on ICD-10 for risk adjustment (13). The modified CCI was dichotomized (low morbidity = 0, high = 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical conditions were classified with a modified version of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) on the basis of hospital discharge International Classification Disease 10 th version (ICD-10) codes. This Charlson-like index uses a single hospital diagnosis based on ICD-10 for risk adjustment (13). The modified CCI was dichotomized (low morbidity = 0, high = 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por exemplo, o índice Charlson, 15 da mesma forma que outros índices semelhantes de ajustes de co-morbidades, 16 poderia ter auxiliado na melhor discriminação dos fatores associados à chance de óbito hospitalar e melhor ajuste para a gravidade da causa da internação. Além disso, não se pode descartar a possibilidade de erros (intencionais ou não) referentes às causas de internação e às causas básicas dos óbitos.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…CCI, in the way it was used in this study, gives much more perspective to the seriousness of the reason for admission than the weight of the patient's comorbidities. The adaptation proposed by Ramiarina et al 22 performs satisfactorily in adjusting the seriousness in the HIS/SUS database, especially in the analysis of the cost of the hospital stay. However, there were limitations in the use of this index for evaluating some outcomes, mainly because the majority of HAAs did not contain information on secondary diagnoses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This restriction was observed in the records used in this study, and also in other studies. 13,22 The main limitations of this study, described above, are related to its retrospective design and the use of secondary databases. Together, these characteristics limit the collection of other important data and may have introduced bias in selection and information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%