2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89102007000300017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounders using an electronic spreadsheet

Abstract: Análise de sensibilidade para um confundidor não mensurado utilizando planilha eletrônica ABSTRACTIn studies assessing the effects of a given exposure variable and a specifi c outcome of interest, confusion may arise from the mistaken impression that the exposure variable is producing the outcome of interest, when in fact the observed effect is due to an existing confounder. However, quantitative techniques are rarely used to determine the potential infl uence of unmeasured confounders. Sensitivity analysis is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed with stent type, propensity score, and any unbalanced variables as covariates. One‐way sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the possible effect of an unknown confounder [9].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed with stent type, propensity score, and any unbalanced variables as covariates. One‐way sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the possible effect of an unknown confounder [9].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…We implemented this analysis in an Excel spreadsheet (see Supplementary Table A1 and A5) following Greenland () and Rothman, Greenland, and Lash (), pp. 348–351,), although other approaches exist (Cabral and Luiz ; Lash, Fox, and Fin ; Luiz and Cabral ). Based on the observed associations, we used event rates of 16 and 20 percent for DES and BMS recipients, respectively, and assumed a single, binary hypothetical confounder with prevalence of 0.4 among BMS recipients…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results can be obtained by formulas given in the work by Greenland 2 or Greenland et al 10 , and easily implemented in a spreadsheet 25 .…”
Section: The Greenland Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By establishing Γ = 1.0; 1.5; 1.8; 1.9; 2.0 and 3.0, the p-values of the upper and lower limits obtained through the Rosenbaum method are given in Table 5. These calculations are not easy to obtain manually, but they can be promptly executed using an electronic spreadsheet, as can be found in the study carried out by Cabral and Luiz 25 . The lowest value for Γ to remove all statistical significance from Mantel-Haenszel is Γ = 1.9, at a 95% confidence level.…”
Section: The Rosenbaum Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%