1984
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89101984000200009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Esterilização feminina: liberdade e opressão

Abstract: BARROSO, C. Esterilização feminina: liberdade e opressão. Rev. Saúde públ., S. Paulo, 18: 170-80,1984.RESUMO: É mostrado que a esterilização feminina tem aumentado extraordinariamente nos últimos anos no Brasil. Em alguns Estados do Nordeste, este é o meio anticoncepcional mais comumente usado, sendo os hospitais estaduais e municipais e o Instituto Nacional de Assistência Médica e Previdência Social (INAMPS) os principais fornecedores. Entretanto, em que pese haver numerosos abusos praticados, de esterilizaç… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
15

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…De fato, quase dez anos antes, Barroso (1984) já advertia que determinantes específicos, tais como a estrutura do atendimento hospitalar e a ausência de políticas públicas que fizessem face à crescente demanda por contracepção moderna, levavam as mulheres a elegerem a laqueadura tubária como método de preferência.…”
Section: Revisão Da Literaturaunclassified
“…De fato, quase dez anos antes, Barroso (1984) já advertia que determinantes específicos, tais como a estrutura do atendimento hospitalar e a ausência de políticas públicas que fizessem face à crescente demanda por contracepção moderna, levavam as mulheres a elegerem a laqueadura tubária como método de preferência.…”
Section: Revisão Da Literaturaunclassified
“…New technologies and changing values that permeated the birth control process (Back apud Vieira, 2003) are identified, for example, in the development of techniques for surgical sterilization -"extreme of the contraception medicalization aspect" (Vieira, 2003, p. 62). Thus, if then sterilization occurred with eugenic purposes, it is now a voluntary choice, solution for the fertility control, legitimized by the medicine and funded by the government (Vieira, 2003;Barroso, 1984).…”
Section: Birth Control Of and Reduction Of Poverty: Neoliberal Discoumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, the fertility rate has remained virtually constant from 1930 until 1965, when it began to decline. The total fertility rate (TFT) dropped from 5.8 children in 1970 (Ipea, 1996) After 1970, an increase on the use of contraceptives, practice of abortion and sterilization was evidenced (Berquó, 1982;Barroso, 1984), with regional differences: sterilization was relatively more important in the Northeastern Brazil than in the state of Sao Paulo, with more expansion between women with lower education levels (Rodrigues et al, 1979(Rodrigues et al, , 1980Nakamura & Fonseca, 1978).…”
Section: Birth Control Of and Reduction Of Poverty: Neoliberal Discoumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of sterilization as a means of fertility regulation is not without controversy. Allegations have been raised over coercive sterilizations in several Latin American countries, with the debate fuelled by feminists who claim sterilizations are being performed without women's knowledge and consent, by religious leaders who denounce sterilizations as contradicting the doctrine of the Catholic Church, and by activities who attack sterilization programmes -especially those receiving international funding -as exploitation of the poor (Berquo, 1982;Barroso, 1984;Rizo & Roper, 1986;United Nations Population Fund, 2002). Such controversy underscores the need for a better comprehension of the determinants of female sterilization in the region.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%