1998
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-77011998000100003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De onde surgem os modelos? As origens e expansões Tupi na Amazônia Central

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
28

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
28
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis is based either on the association of Tupian speakers and the Amazon Polychromic Ceramic Tradition with the assertion that these ceramics should be older in the Amazon region than anywhere else. However, this assertion has been contested in the last few years by systematic archaeological studies revealing quite recent dates for such a ceramic tradition, from 1050 BP to younger dates (Heckenberger et al 1998). In recent studies (Mageste 2008), the earliest ages for the Figure 3 Earliest and most recent available dating for Tupiguarani settlements over the Brazilian territory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis is based either on the association of Tupian speakers and the Amazon Polychromic Ceramic Tradition with the assertion that these ceramics should be older in the Amazon region than anywhere else. However, this assertion has been contested in the last few years by systematic archaeological studies revealing quite recent dates for such a ceramic tradition, from 1050 BP to younger dates (Heckenberger et al 1998). In recent studies (Mageste 2008), the earliest ages for the Figure 3 Earliest and most recent available dating for Tupiguarani settlements over the Brazilian territory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although early syntheses postulated that the Tupiguarani pottery was derived from the Amazon polychrome tradition (Brochado 1984), refinements in chronology and stylistic analyses suggest it was an earlier, though related development (Almeida 2013;Heckenberger et al 1998). Pottery clearly identifiable as Tupiguarani appears in the archaeological record around 2700 cal yr BP (Corrêa 2014, p. 255); this broadly coincides with the linguistic estimate, based on glottochronology, for the beginning of the Tupí-Guaraní diaspora (e.g., Rodrigues 1964) around 2,500 years ago.…”
Section: The Tupiguaranimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os problemas vão desde a cronologia das tradições cerâmicas e a associação entre tradição cerâmica e falantes de proto-língua, passando pela ausência de datas comprovadoras em sítios que estariam na área correspondente à proto-Tupi-Guarani (Viveiros de Castro, 1996; Urban, 1996; Heckenberger, Neves e Petersen, 1998). Heckenberger et al (1998) criticam a associação entre TPA e povos proto-Tupi, com base em análise do material recolhido de sítios próximos à desembocadura do rio Negro, que estariam em plena área de origem proto-Tupi. A argumentação aponta que a cerâmica encontrada nestes sítios não está entre a mais antiga de toda a Amazônia, o que contraria a hipótese de origem dos Tupi na Amazônia central.…”
Section: A Visão Arqueológica (Mapa 2)unclassified