1998
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-75901998000200011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global TransPark in Brazil infrastructure for competitive advantage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They are promoted by, inter alia, airport authorities, developers and governments as economically and physically integrated initiatives of the airport and urban development (Schlaack 2010). Such models include airport city (Conway 1993;Kasarda 2009), aerotropolis (Kasarda 2009;Kasarda & Lindsay 2011), airport region (Schlaack 2010), airfront (Blanton 2004), global transpark (Kasarda 1998;Sit 2004), airport corridor (Schaafsma 2003, cited in Schlaack 2010, airea (Schlaack 2010), decoplex (Conway 1993), aircity, aeropolis, aeropark, aviopolis, avioport, flight forum, sky city, airpark, aero city and aeroscape. Among the aforementioned models, airport city and aerotropolis are the most dominant in the literature and in practice.…”
Section: Literature Overview and Conceptual Frame Of Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are promoted by, inter alia, airport authorities, developers and governments as economically and physically integrated initiatives of the airport and urban development (Schlaack 2010). Such models include airport city (Conway 1993;Kasarda 2009), aerotropolis (Kasarda 2009;Kasarda & Lindsay 2011), airport region (Schlaack 2010), airfront (Blanton 2004), global transpark (Kasarda 1998;Sit 2004), airport corridor (Schaafsma 2003, cited in Schlaack 2010, airea (Schlaack 2010), decoplex (Conway 1993), aircity, aeropolis, aeropark, aviopolis, avioport, flight forum, sky city, airpark, aero city and aeroscape. Among the aforementioned models, airport city and aerotropolis are the most dominant in the literature and in practice.…”
Section: Literature Overview and Conceptual Frame Of Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concepts include airport city (Conway, 1993;Kasarda, 2009), aerotropolis (Kasarda, 2009;Kasarda & Lindsay, 2011), airport region (Schlaack, 2010: 116), airfront (Blanton, 2004), global transpark (Kasarda, 1998;Sit, 2004), airport corridor (Schaafsma, 2003, cited in Schlaack, 2010, airea (Schlaack, 2010), decoplex (Conway, 1993), aircity, aeropolis, aeropark, aviopolis, avioport, flight forum, sky city, airpark, aero city, and aeroscape. Among the aforementioned, airport city and aerotropolis can be distinguished as the most dominant in the literature and in practice.…”
Section: The Development Of Airportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The release of platform territory (as opposed to land abutting the airport) for integrated hotel development is now an important strategy, as seen, for example, in Hong Kong International Airport's 1000 room Marriott hotel at their SkyCity development. This hotel is a key element in Hong Kong's Global TransPark model, where the airport acts as an important logistical centre for air cargo, telecommunications, flexible manufacturing, and logistics, particularly where the goods involved are high-value, but low weight (Kasarda 1998;Sit 2004). In this context, airport hotels will play an important role as a meeting place for the multiple agents involved in these new economic zones, which aims to integrate the Pearl River Delta with mainland China.…”
Section: The Evolution Of the Airport Hotelmentioning
confidence: 99%