2001
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-71082001000200014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diurnal bird visiting of Caryocar brasiliense Camb. in Central Brazil

Abstract: Nectar of nocturnal flowers may be used by diurnal species that occasionally accomplish secondary pollination. Thirteen bird species visited Caryocar brasiliense flowers in central Brazil. There is a temporal separation between nectarivores and non-nectarivores species. Nectarivores birds visited flowers late in the morning, while other species appear earlier. C. brasiliense nectar may be an alternative resource to birds visitors during the dry season.Key words: birds, Caryocar brasiliense, nectar, resource. R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of bats as pollinators of Pequi trees is recognized in the literature (Melo, 2001;Oliveira et al, 2008;Carvalho, 2008) and by the Pontinha respondents, although the Salience Index was low for bats (S=0.017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The importance of bats as pollinators of Pequi trees is recognized in the literature (Melo, 2001;Oliveira et al, 2008;Carvalho, 2008) and by the Pontinha respondents, although the Salience Index was low for bats (S=0.017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hummingbirds were also identified as important floral visitors both at Pontinha (S=0.261) and by Melo (2001), in a study conducted in Distrito Federal, in the central Brazilian region. The presence of floral visitors was related to the pursuit of pollen or honey, sweet liquid, sugar, and nectar, and their categorization indicates a similar perception for the type of use, although with distinct terminology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genus Handroanthus (Tabebuia) tends to produce nectar in concentrations ranging from 23 to 30.6% (Barros, 2001;Souza et al 2004). This concentration could be considered high (Lotz and Schondube 2006), for example, when compared to diurnal (16%) (Melo, 2001) and nocturnal (13.4%) concentrations (Gribel, 1986) of Caryocar brasiliense (Cambess) (Piqui), a quiropterophilous species that also blooms in the dry season. Apparently, F. xanthopterygius has a considerable energetic gain by using a concentrated resource, with a relevant caloric reward and in times of scarcity of other resources and water.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comm.). Lastly, nectar productivity and concentrations may have an influence on the number of plant species visited by different hummingbirds or on the time spent on the same individual (Melo, 2001). Nevertheless, further data on the relative abundance of plant and hummingbird species are required to test those hypotheses.…”
Section: The Hummingbird Guildmentioning
confidence: 99%