1992
DOI: 10.1590/s0006-87051992000200002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identificação de espécies de citros mediante polimorfismo enzimático

Abstract: Estudou-se, mediante polimorfismo enzimático em gel de poliacrilamida, a variabilidade genética das espécies de laranja-doce (Citrus sinensis); laranja-azeda (C. aurantium); tangerinas clementina (C. clementina), sunki (C. sunki), cleópatra (C. reshni) e poncã (C. rsticulata); lima-da-pérsia (C. limettioides); limão-galego (C. aurantifolia); limão-cravo (C. limonia) e trifoliata (Poncirus trifoliata). Extratos de folhas foram analisados para as isoenzimas de malato deidrogenase (MDH), enzima málica (ME), leuci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the phenotypes were very similar to those described by Torres et al (1978Torres et al ( , 1982, Ballvé et al (1991), Sawazaki et al (1992) and Jarrel et al (1992). Some alleles shared by P. trifoliata and other Citrus species suggest that the two genera, Citrus and Poncirus, are structurally and functionally related at the genomic level, although taxonomically distinct on a morphological level, which would explain the results of crossing these species (Torres et al, 1985;Jarrel et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In general, the phenotypes were very similar to those described by Torres et al (1978Torres et al ( , 1982, Ballvé et al (1991), Sawazaki et al (1992) and Jarrel et al (1992). Some alleles shared by P. trifoliata and other Citrus species suggest that the two genera, Citrus and Poncirus, are structurally and functionally related at the genomic level, although taxonomically distinct on a morphological level, which would explain the results of crossing these species (Torres et al, 1985;Jarrel et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%