2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2012001000015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing planning skills and executive functions in the elderly: preliminary normative data for the Tower of London Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The version adopted on this study was standardized by Krikorian, Bartok and Gay (1994), and was previously validated for this population (de Paula et al, 2012a). Normative values were also previously published for clinical use (de Paula et al, 2012b).…”
Section: Neuropsychological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The version adopted on this study was standardized by Krikorian, Bartok and Gay (1994), and was previously validated for this population (de Paula et al, 2012a). Normative values were also previously published for clinical use (de Paula et al, 2012b).…”
Section: Neuropsychological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… [1] Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) 16 – version for elderly (evaluates executive functions); [2] Trail Making Test (TMT – Parts 1 & 2) 17 (evaluates speed of processing, mental flexibility and executive functioning); [3] Tower of London Test (ToL) 18 (assesses planning abilities and problem solving); [4] Stroop Test (Victoria Version) 19 (assesses selective attention and inhibitory control); [5] Digit Span Forward and Backward – WAIS 20 (measures working memory's number storage capacity; [6] Verbal Fluency Test (Semantic and Phonemic): 21 evaluates semantic fluency using animals categories and phonological fluency test using the FAS; [7] Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), 22 used in evaluation of declarative memory; [8] Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI): 23 used to assess sleep quality; [9] Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS); 24 [10] Sleep Habits Questionnaire 25 (assesses sleep habits and sleep conditions). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para cada problema, o sujeito tem três chances de realizar com a menor quanti dade de movimentos, e sua pontuação pode variar de 3 pontos (se conseguir resolver o problema na primeira apresentação) a 0 pontos (se não conseguir resolver em nenhuma das apresentações). Essa versão foi normati zada em diversos contextos, como a Itália 16 , República Checa 17 e Brasil [18][19][20] . Embora muito popular, a versão de madeira da ToL tem sido questi onada sobre um potencial efeito teto em relação ao desempenho da população geral 21 , sendo propostos sistemas de pontuação alternati vos para a tarefa.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified