2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2011000700003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients in a centre in Buenos Aires

Abstract: Sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (sALS) is considered a multifactorial disease with genetic and environmental factors causing motor neuron degeneration. Objective: To describe the epidemiological and occupational characteristics of patients with sALS who attended the Ramos Mejía Hospital at Buenos Aires, Argentina. Method: We analyzed the medical records of sALS patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2008. All occupations were coded according to the International Standard Classification of Occupation (ISCO)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean age at ALS diagnosis was 56.27 years, which was higher than that among Hispanics (47.5), 12 Argentineans (55), 13 and cohorts in India (46.2), 14 but lower than in Japan (64.8). 15 Mean/median survival time for ALS in Taiwan (67.8/66.6 months) was similar to that in Hispanics 12 (mean = 68.6 months), higher than that in Italians (median = 16 months) 16 and Irish (median = 16.4), 17 and lower than that reported in Indians (median = 114.8 months).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Mean age at ALS diagnosis was 56.27 years, which was higher than that among Hispanics (47.5), 12 Argentineans (55), 13 and cohorts in India (46.2), 14 but lower than in Japan (64.8). 15 Mean/median survival time for ALS in Taiwan (67.8/66.6 months) was similar to that in Hispanics 12 (mean = 68.6 months), higher than that in Italians (median = 16 months) 16 and Irish (median = 16.4), 17 and lower than that reported in Indians (median = 114.8 months).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…For example, studies based on the original EEDC included all categories of ALS (Definite, Probable, Possible, Suspected), n = 12, 3 , 39 , 40 , 42–45 , 48 , 51 , 53 , 66 or excluded cases who, during follow-up, remained suspected ALS ( n = 4) 4,37,38,54 or suspected/possible ALS ( n = 2) 6 , 59 . Conversely, most papers that used the revised version of EEDC included all types of ALS (Definite, Probable, Probable laboratory supported, Possible) ( n = 13), 8–14 , 46 , 47 , 50 , 57 , 64 and only one excluded cases with possible ALS during follow-up ( n = 1) 121 . However, when looking at standardized rates (i.e when controlling for age and sex distribution of the underlying population), ALS heterogeneity was not explained by the diagnosis ( P = 0.51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an American study using capture-recapture method, only considering patients with definite ALS, the estimated prevalence was set 4.7 and 5.0/100,000 in 2012 and 2013 respectively [16], results very similar to ours. Prevalence in Latin America countries ranges from 0.9 to 8.86/100,000 inhabitants [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. However, there are significant methodological differences (e.g., some studies used a different diagnostic category for cases se-lection).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%