1999
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27491999000600010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confocal microscopic study of rabbit and human corneal epithelia using two objectives with different numerical aperture

Abstract: The prospective study compares the confocal microscopic images of the rabbit and human corneal epithelial layers obtained with two objectives having different numerical apertures (NA). Methods: Ten rabbit eyes were enucleated and kept in place by a pneumatic support to ensure the best performance of each objective, with no disturbance due to eye movements. Five normal patients were selected after agreement. The rabbit eyes and those of the patients were all examined with slit lamp. Confocal microscopy (Tomey, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference of the electrical conductivity between the human eye and the rabbit eye originates from the difference of the tissue properties. Compared to the human, the rabbit has less layers in the superficial tissues, such as the cornea and sclera, 33 which lead to the higher conductivity of the sclera in the rabbit than in the human. In addition, the electrical conductivities of living tissues are considerably different from those of dead tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference of the electrical conductivity between the human eye and the rabbit eye originates from the difference of the tissue properties. Compared to the human, the rabbit has less layers in the superficial tissues, such as the cornea and sclera, 33 which lead to the higher conductivity of the sclera in the rabbit than in the human. In addition, the electrical conductivities of living tissues are considerably different from those of dead tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%