1999
DOI: 10.1590/s0001-37141999000300005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algae and cyanobacteria on painted surfaces in Southern Brazil

Abstract: Algae and cyanobacteria disfigure the external surfaces of buildings and may cause their physico-chemical deterioration. Even though the climate in Brazil is humid, there is no published literature on this problem. The objective of this work was to identify the major phototrophs present on Brazilian constructions in residential, urban and rural sites. The algal and cyanobacterial types present on discolored surfaces of painted buildings in nine different municipalities in Brazil, all lying between latitudes 19… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
8
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The major biomass on building 2 was fungal, and the diversity of phototrophs on this relatively clean building was less than on building 1, except in a surface crack, where it was greater. The majority of the phototrophs detected on both buildings were coccoid, rather than ¢lamentous, agreeing with results previously obtained on painted surfaces in Brazil [1]. After cleaning, almost no phototrophs were detected and no actinomycetes or protozoa were seen, although they were present on the original surfaces.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The major biomass on building 2 was fungal, and the diversity of phototrophs on this relatively clean building was less than on building 1, except in a surface crack, where it was greater. The majority of the phototrophs detected on both buildings were coccoid, rather than ¢lamentous, agreeing with results previously obtained on painted surfaces in Brazil [1]. After cleaning, almost no phototrophs were detected and no actinomycetes or protozoa were seen, although they were present on the original surfaces.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Carpet samples were cultured onto Sabouraud dextrose agar and fungi identi¢ed by cell and colony morphology [11,12]. Tape strip samples taken for phycological analysis were incubated on solid modi¢ed Knop's medium (MKM) and phototrophs identi¢ed as described in Gaylarde and Gaylarde [1] after up to 3 months incubation. The latter sampling and culture technique was also used, with up to 2 weeks incubation, to identify and count fungi directly on the plate by transmitted light microscopy with objectives up to U25.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation is in agreement with the findings of Abdel-Hafez and Shoreit (1985). The mineral-based BG-11 medium was previously reported to be suitable for growth of fungi of different origins (Gaylarde and Gaylarde 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Most coccoid cyanobacteria cannot be cultured except in mixed cultures which retain the initial spatial relationships of the organisms in the samples. Isolation of pure cyanobacteria in culture prior to identification frequently leads to the loss of coccoid forms and a major diminution in their detection rate (Gaylarde & Gaylarde, 1999). It is also noted that filamentous organisms of the Nostocaceae, Trentepohliaceae and Eustigmatos are frequently present in the biofilms of xerotic surfaces in a coccoid growth form and that Oscillatoriales seldom form long filaments in dry habitats.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%