2016
DOI: 10.1590/2317-6431-2016-1712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potenciais evocados auditivos de tronco encefálico em adultos em posição de repouso e em movimentação

Abstract: Purpose: Recording the evoked auditory brainstem response, in resting conditions and movement for the same individual, using new equipment/ system Integrity and verifying the agreement of these responses when compared to a conventional gold device/system standard in the market. Methods: Thirty normal-hearing adults from both genders, aged 18 to 30 years, were submitted to Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR). Two devices, a device/system Integrity, using bluetooth technology, the conditions of rest and motion and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some factors may have influenced this finding, referring to the profile of the babies in the present study, because at the ages of 6 to 24 months of age, babies do not sleep easily for the proper examination, which may have influenced recording of wave I. However, a Brazilian study ( 20 ), which analyzed probable differences in absolute latencies and interpeak intervals between the assessed situations, asleep and awake, with the same equipment used in the current study (Integrity V500), did not find statistically significant differences ( 20 ). Another possibility for the increase in the absolute latency of wave I could be the features of the equipment, recording wave I slightly above the predicted standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Some factors may have influenced this finding, referring to the profile of the babies in the present study, because at the ages of 6 to 24 months of age, babies do not sleep easily for the proper examination, which may have influenced recording of wave I. However, a Brazilian study ( 20 ), which analyzed probable differences in absolute latencies and interpeak intervals between the assessed situations, asleep and awake, with the same equipment used in the current study (Integrity V500), did not find statistically significant differences ( 20 ). Another possibility for the increase in the absolute latency of wave I could be the features of the equipment, recording wave I slightly above the predicted standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The inclusion criteria considered for the study and control groups were the following: all children must have presented normal hearing thresholds 12 and normal auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) 13 elicited with click stimuli. The ABR was recorded prior to MMN to ensure that the participants presented normal auditory pathway synchrony.…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%