O Perigo Das Dobras: Iconografias E Corporalidades No Feminismo Contemporâneo

Abstract

Resumo Tendo como tema os movimentos sociais contemporâneos e a produção de sujeitos políticos, a pesquisa de que resulta este artigo analisa o trânsito entre ativismos e o múltiplo pertencimento político a fim de entender a chamada “hifenização” dos feminismos. De cunho etnográfico, a investigação tem como objeto empírico uma rede informal de ativistas que se reconhecem como feministas, têm entre 20 e 30 anos de idade, estão na universidade e provêm de camadas médias urbanas. Elas se apropriam de referências diversas, como o vegetarianismo, o autonomismo, o punk, o direito à cidade, e o anarquismo, tecendo interlocuções e articulações com outras pautas de luta além do gênero. O artigo observa como esses trânsitos são encarnados e tomam corpo no ativismo, por meio de uma análise documental voltada para a produção iconográfica de fanzines, cartazes e documentos de campo.

The Independent Electronic Music Party Scene/Circuit in São Paulo: A Panorama of the 2010s

“…According to Rocha (2012), rather than in traditional and institutional political expressions the politicization of everyday life is expressed in aestheticization and corporeality. Here we see the politicization of the body as a central articulator of discourses and practices, a political artifact that is not only a vehicle for transmitting messages in contemporary youth activism but also the message itself (Carmo, 2018), a marker of differences (gender, class, ethnicity, sexuality, generation) and an articulator of performed identities.…”

“…What the two had in common was the pursuit of individual and collective freedom. Another element of this scene/circuit was the political meaning of the occupation of public space in relation to the body and its aestheticization (Carmo, 2018; Taylor, 2012). This new party scene/circuit was characterized by a new way of partying, a new experience (atmospheres, powerful sound systems, clothing, and aesthetics), the recovery of an underground attitude involving concrete political and artistic action, and the use of post–mass communication (Lemos, 2014) and social networks in the structure of production, circulation, and publicity.…”

“… 3. “Collective” is a common term among youth groups. According to Carmo (2018), it is a fundamental and organizational category consisting of more horizontal and noninstitutionalized political/activist groupings whose members maintain relationships of affinity and friendship. They may be unstable and contingent arrangements that are linked to other groupings in the form of networks, characterized by affectivity, different political and identity agendas, different forms of collaboration and association, and changing numbers of members. …”