2018
DOI: 10.1590/2236-8906-23/2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Himatanthus bracteatus (A. DC.) Woodson (Apocynaceae): phenology, morphology, and floral biology of a species endemic to the Atlantic Forest

Abstract: Himatanthus bracteatus (A. DC.) Woodson (Apocynaceae): phenology, morphology, and fl oral biology of a species endemic to the Atlantic Forest). Janaúba, Himatanthus bracteatus (A. DC.) Woodson is a species native to the Atlantic Forest and restricted to the northeastern and southeastern regions of Brazil, and has potential as ornamental or in the recovery of degraded areas. Considering that the information about its reproductive mechanisms is scarce, this study aimed to describe the aspects of the phenology, m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A wide variety of methods for data collection, evaluation, and analysis have been employed to examine the synchrony and intensity of plant phenological events using qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative methods (Bencke & Morellato, 2002;Morellato et al, 2010a, Alexander & Woeste, 2016. Semi-quantitative approaches establish predefined scales without the use of exact measurements (Fournier, 1974;Pugas et al, 2018;Araujo & Lobo 2020) or percentages of canopy cover (Lenza & Klink, 2006). Intensity analyses, on the other hand, are measured or estimated (Bencke & Morellato, 2002;Castro-Díez et al, 2003), and most evaluations of synchrony have been based on qualitative data (Augspurger, 1983;Bolmgren, 1998;Bencke & Morellato, 2002;Morellato et al, 2010b;Baldauf et al, 2014;Rodriguez-Pérez & Traveset 2016;Andreacci et al, 2017;Araujo & Lobo 2020;Rosa et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide variety of methods for data collection, evaluation, and analysis have been employed to examine the synchrony and intensity of plant phenological events using qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative methods (Bencke & Morellato, 2002;Morellato et al, 2010a, Alexander & Woeste, 2016. Semi-quantitative approaches establish predefined scales without the use of exact measurements (Fournier, 1974;Pugas et al, 2018;Araujo & Lobo 2020) or percentages of canopy cover (Lenza & Klink, 2006). Intensity analyses, on the other hand, are measured or estimated (Bencke & Morellato, 2002;Castro-Díez et al, 2003), and most evaluations of synchrony have been based on qualitative data (Augspurger, 1983;Bolmgren, 1998;Bencke & Morellato, 2002;Morellato et al, 2010b;Baldauf et al, 2014;Rodriguez-Pérez & Traveset 2016;Andreacci et al, 2017;Araujo & Lobo 2020;Rosa et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%